Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai has stepped into his new role as the defence minister with a clear message: cooperation, not control. Emphasizing a collaborative approach, Phumtham asserts he will never attempt to impose the government’s executive power over the armed forces. Instead, he intends to work closely with them to ensure they serve the public effectively and in society’s best interests. Scheduled to officially assume his duties on Monday, after the government’s policy statement is delivered in parliament over the next two days, Phumtham is set to bring a fresh perspective to the Ministry of Defence.
Phumtham’s ascension follows the departure of Sutin Klungsang, who was ousted during a recent cabinet reshuffle. Speaking on Tuesday, Phumtham shared his plans for his first official day: a meal meeting with the leaders of the armed forces. These gatherings are more than mere formalities; they are opportunities to build rapport and outline priorities. Before the meal, he expects to receive a briefing from the Ministry of Defence—setting the stage for him to address their key defence strategies. As a symbolic gesture of his commitment, he will also inspect the guards of honor after the meeting.
Beyond ceremonial duties, Phumtham faces the immediate task of approving the reshuffled military appointments. He emphasized the importance of consulting with both the armed forces and ministry executives before finalizing any decisions. The looming deadline for these appointments is September 15, raising questions about whether there will be pressure to expedite the process. Phumtham, however, remains pragmatic. “I don’t feel pressured to rush,” he noted, acknowledging the unexpected governmental changes that have caused delays. “We will try our best to start working as soon as possible and stick to the deadline. But if, in the end, we miss it… everyone else should understand.”
Last week’s meeting of armed forces leaders and defence ministry executives laid the groundwork for Phumtham’s tasks ahead. The meeting included discussions on the proposed appointments of replacements. There’s a consensus among military officials that the new defence minister should have the final say on critical issues, such as the appointment of the new navy commander, which remains a contentious topic.
Phumtham’s approach signals a strategic pivot—prioritizing open dialogue and mutual respect within the ministry. As he gears up to assume his role, all eyes are on how effectively he can navigate these initial challenges and implement changes that reflect his vision. With his steadfast commitment to collaboration, Phumtham is poised to usher in a new era of defence leadership.
Prioritizing collaboration sounds nice, but isn’t it just political rhetoric? When has any minister genuinely worked harmoniously with the military?
I think it’s a step in the right direction. At least he’s trying something different!
Trying and succeeding are two different things. I’ll believe it when I see results.
Anna, how can you be so naive? The military-industrial complex is a beast! Trying alone isn’t enough.
Agreed, John. Politicians say one thing and do another. Let’s see if he actually delivers.
This sounds like a breath of fresh air! Mutual respect and dialogue? That’s exactly what we need in these times of global tension.
Global tension isn’t going to be solved by the Thai Defence Minister’s new approach.
No one expects that, Amit. But every bit of improvement helps. It’s better than constant conflicts.
I bet this collaborative approach falls apart the moment there’s a serious disagreement. History repeats itself.
You’re so cynical, Matthew. Give him a chance before condemning his efforts.
Sarika, past experience makes me a realist, not a cynic.
Why does the military need so much autonomy anyway? Isn’t it time for a more civilian-directed approach?
Phumtham’s idea to have meal meetings with military leaders sounds trivial. That’s not how you discuss serious issues!
It’s called building rapport, Leo. Importantly, it’s about setting the tone for open communication.
I get rapport, but there’s a time and place. Military decisions shouldn’t be made over dinner.
Who said they’d be making decisions over dinner? It’s just a way to start on a good note. Chill!
The reshuffled military appointments are where the real test lies. If he can manage them effectively, perhaps there’s hope.
This is all smoke and mirrors. The real power is still with the generals.
Exactly, Tom. Civilians pretending to have control while the military pulls the strings.
Inspection of the guards of honor might be symbolic, but these rituals matter. They show commitment and respect.
‘No pressure to rush’? Sounds like he’s already making excuses for potential failure.
Apoorva, sometimes it’s better to be realistic about deadlines than overpromise and underdeliver.
The deadline for military appointments is Sept 15. If he misses it, it’ll be his first failure in office. Not a great start.
Liam, everyone knows that reshuffles cause delays. Let’s give him a fair chance.
Open dialogue and mutual respect? These buzzwords mean nothing if there’s no concrete action.
Exactly, Jay! Politicians have mastered the art of saying nothing with a lot of words.
It’s easy to criticize when you’re not the one in the hot seat. Let’s see what he can do.
Hasn’t this approach been tried before and failed in other countries? Why would it work here?
The Ministry of Defence needs a strong leader, not someone who emphasizes ‘collaboration’ over control.
Konrad, strong leadership doesn’t mean total control. Collaboration can also be a strength.
If Phumtham doesn’t rush his decisions, it can lead to well-thought-out strategies. Rushing can cause more harm than good. Stay patient, people.
Julian, in high-stakes situations like these, there’s a fine line between patience and procrastination.