In a lively twist of events, the People’s Party (PP) has turned up the pressure on the Interior Ministry, urging a swift revocation of the land deeds of the Alpine Golf Club in Pathum Thani. PP list MP, Chulapong Yukate, passionately called upon Chamnanwit Terat, the current deputy permanent secretary overseeing the Department of Lands (DoL), to expedite the nullification process, restoring the land to its rightful status as monastic property.
This intriguing saga began with Neum Chamnanchartsakda, a benevolent and affluent supporter of Wat Thamikararam Worawihan since its inception in 1922. With wisdom and philanthropy in her heart, she bequeathed the land to the temple in her will. Yet, here we stand, with a twist in the tale as Mr. Chulapong ardently argues for honoring Neum’s dying wish.
Fueling the plot, a prior nullification order was signed by Chada Thaised, a senior figure from the Bhumjaithai Party, shortly before his exit as deputy interior minister last year. Mr. Chulapong, however, is determined to ensure this story doesn’t gather dust, stressing the urgency to act, lest Mr. Chamnanwit fall afoul of Sections 49 and 54 of the Administrative Procedure Act, BE 2539 (1996). These sections are the guardians against orders that could veer onto illegal terrain.
The land’s legality adds another layer to this story. Trade on this plot is outlawed, and Mr. Chulapong wisely advised Mr. Chamnanwit to refrain from forming a dedicated committee, notably unlike the tangled 5,083-rai land dispute in Khao Kradong, Buri Ram.
Looking forward, Mr. Chulapong plans to pose some pointed questions to Interior Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, keen to unravel the ministry’s procedural threads in this matter if momentum isn’t gained within the next few months.
Intrigue and scandal deepen as a Department of Lands report from September 2, 2024, proposes a financial twist. It suggests the Shinawatra family might find itself tangled in compensation payments of at least 7.7 billion baht. This turns into a fiscal drama if the landowners decide to pursue the DoL for restitution due to the nullification drama.
The plot thickens when you consider the breakdown: a valuation estimate of 7.22 billion baht topped off by 439.05 million baht in mortgage capital. The Alpine Golf and Sports Club Co might need to pool resources with the DoL and the Mahamakut Buddhist University Foundation, Neum’s estate managers, to make reparations to 533 landowners and 30 mortgagees as per Isara News.
In an engaging chapter of political maneuvering, financial repercussions, and historical legacy, the tale of the Alpine Golf Club lands continues to unravel, leaving audiences on the edge of their seats, wondering how this captivating plot will conclude.
I believe returning the land to the monastic order is the right thing to do. Respect for sacred intentions should trump profit-making entities.
That’s a nice thought, but do you think the current landowners have no rights? They acquired it legally, after all.
If the acquisition was based on a flawed premise, legality is just an excuse. Honoring a donor’s last wish should matter.
Absolutely! Historical wrongs need correcting, even if it’s inconvenient for the current stakeholders.
This feud reeks of political grandstanding. I’m sure Yukate and Chamnanwit are just using this as leverage against their opponents.
Classic case of politicians twisting situations to earn points. But isn’t their job to care about such matters?
In theory, yes, but they’ve got self-interests tied into everything. This isn’t about the monastery solely, just posturing.
Isn’t the potential 7.7 billion baht compensation worrying anyone else? This kind of financial burden affects taxpayers too.
You’re right, Jerry. But if the initial acquisition was tainted, shouldn’t some accountability fall on the ones who mismanaged it?
Sure, accountability is important. But imagine the mess if every historical error required a payout. It’s a slippery slope.
Real estate laws need restructuring to prevent such issues. This case is proof that we’re lacking a sustainable legal framework.
Agreed, Lucy. A reformed system could help, but political resistance would make this endeavor difficult.
Resistance always exists, but it’s our responsibility to push forward for comprehensive reform. We can’t rely on outdated methods forever.
Why doesn’t the Shinawatra family step up front with a gesture of goodwill towards resolving this? They can afford it.
It’s probably strategic silence—waiting for the dust to settle before they make a move, if at all.
True, but sitting on the sidelines doesn’t paint a good picture for them. Actions speak louder than words.
The ethical implications of this situation are what get me. How can we ignore the core value of fulfilling the donor’s original wish?
It’s mind-boggling to see that legal measures weren’t stricter earlier. These complications could’ve been avoided.
I’m not convinced this saga will conclude satisfactorily for any party in the near future. Too many interests intersect here.
If it were up to the Buddhist foundation themselves, they’d probably mediate and look for peaceful resolution. Win-win hardly happens in politics.
Does anyone else feel that these plot twists hint at something bigger under the rug? Corruption, maybe?
Honestly, can’t Pathum Thani just use the land better for community growth instead of just letting it simmer in disputes?
I’m not sure how informed we are about the transactions made over this property. Transparency would be game-changing.
What baffles me is the complete disregard for how this impacts local businesses situated near the golf club. They’re caught in the crossfire too.
I just hope the fallout doesn’t distract us from other pressing issues. Things like this can consume political and public focus way too much.
Do any of you think the temple really cares about getting this land back? Or is this someone else’s personal crusade?