In a poignant snapshot from September 3, 2023, the image of CNS ‘Chang Cheng’—a submarine integral to Thai-Chinese military exercises in Chon Buri province—encapsulates a significant chapter in maritime defense collaboration. This formidable vessel, captured in a file photo courtesy of the Royal Thai Navy, signifies more than just technological prowess; it highlights a strategic partnership with profound implications for regional security.
Recently appointed navy chief, Adm Jirapol Wongwit, is resolute in advancing Thailand’s submarine procurement project with China. Fresh from the ceremonial handover of command, Adm Jirapol expressed his determination to meet with Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, to elucidate the strategic necessity of this initiative. The admiral emphasized that the submarine program is not merely an acquisition but a cornerstone of the navy’s long-term capability-building agenda. He is committed to tackling any apprehensions the defence minister might harbor.
“The navy is also ready to vigorously defend the submarine project before House panels, ensuring that all stakeholders appreciate the critical role this program plays in safeguarding our maritime security,” stated Adm Jirapol with conviction.
However, it’s not all plain sailing. Adm Jirapol revealed plans to convene the submarine management committee for an in-depth briefing on the project’s current state. This follows preliminary discussions with his predecessor, Adm Adung Pan-iam, during the recent transition of duties.
The journey of the submarine project has been a turbulent one. China Shipbuilding & Offshore International Co (CSOC) clinched the contract to construct the submarine for a hefty sum of 13.5 billion baht through a government-to-government agreement with Thailand. Yet, just as the construction reached its midway milestone, the Covid-19 pandemic threw a spanner in the works, causing inevitable delays. Further complications arose when Germany, originally slated to supply the diesel engine, pulled out due to export restrictions on military/defence items, resulting in a temporary halt.
Adm Jirapol’s strategic ambitions extend beyond submarines; he also shed light on the navy’s frigate procurement scheme. The admiral underscored that acquiring a new frigate is an equally critical component of the navy’s overarching strategy to enhance operational capabilities. However, this plan is subject to governmental approval.
“If the government insists on postponing this initiative, our naval capabilities will inevitably diminish. It’s important for everyone to understand the potential limitations we would face as a result,” he noted candidly.
The navy had initially requested a budget allocation of 17 billion baht from the 2024 financial plan to spearhead the frigate project, spreading the expenditure over the next five years. Unfortunately, the House committee tasked with scrutinizing the 2024 budget bill turned down this request. Undeterred, the navy plans to seek funding in the 2026 fiscal budget.
Adm Jirapol’s proactive stance serves as a testament to his commitment to reinforcing the navy’s prowess. His advocacy for crucial procurement projects underscores a vision of fortified maritime security. As these initiatives sail through bureaucratic and logistical challenges, they reflect a broader narrative of resilience and strategic foresight in bolstering Thailand’s naval defenses.
Adm Jirapol’s strategy for strengthening Thailand’s maritime defense is crucial. Submarine and frigate projects shouldn’t be delayed!
I agree. Delays in these projects will only weaken our naval capabilities in a world that is increasingly unsafe.
Indeed, investing in advanced military technology is essential for maintaining regional security and countering potential threats.
But isn’t the cost too high? 30.5 billion baht is no joke, especially when there are other pressing needs in our country.
Can we really trust China with our national defense? The partnership might come with strings attached.
The pandemic alterations are no excuse for lacking readiness. What if such delays happen during actual conflict?
What about internal issues? Shouldn’t we focus on fixing corruption and inefficiency within the navy first?
Good point. An efficient and transparent navy is as important as advanced technology.
Spot on! We can’t keep pouring money into projects without ensuring they’re managed effectively.
Spending billions when people are still recovering from Covid-19 seems irresponsible. Priorities matter.
That’s true, but without a strong defense, all other investments could be jeopardized in times of conflict.
True, but shouldn’t there be a balanced approach? We need defense, but also health and education.
It’s a hard balance to find, but security often takes precedence because it’s the foundation for everything else.
I think this is another classic case of military overspending. The funds could be better used elsewhere.
Why are we still dependent on foreign nations for defense? Shouldn’t we be investing in our own technological advancements?
Developing home-grown technology is ideal, but it’s a long-term plan. We need immediate solutions too.
We’re not there yet. Until then, partnering with technologically advanced nations is our best shot.
Frigates are essential! But it’s disappointing that the budget for this was cut. Hopefully, the 2026 request will go through.
Absolutely. Frigates are critical for operational flexibility and protecting our waters.
But by 2026, it might be too late. Our adversaries aren’t waiting around for us to catch up.
Adm Jirapol’s proactive stance is commendable, but execution is key. Any delays or mismanagement will cost dearly.
17 billion baht for a frigate sounds excessive. We need more transparency on these costs to ensure there’s no waste.
Strong defense is a deterrent to wars. We can’t afford to compromise on these needs.
So true. A strong military presence can prevent conflicts from even arising.
However, focusing too much on military spending and ignoring diplomacy could escalate tensions further.
Why does Thailand need submarines? This feels like a vanity project.
Adm Jirapol is right; these projects are critical for long-term security. We need to look beyond short-term struggles.
It’s shocking how easily military projects get prioritized over pressing public needs.
True, but the public won’t have peace of mind if the nation’s security is at risk.
Peace of mind also comes from good healthcare and education. It’s about balance.
Aside from submarines and frigates, what is being done about cybersecurity? Modern warfare includes digital threats.
I hope Adm Jirapol’s zeal translates into actual, transparent progress and not just more red tape and delays.