Press "Enter" to skip to content

Ammy The Bottom Blues Faces 4 Years: A Defiant Act Against Thai Monarchy Sparks Controversy

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

On a day that buzzed with the heavy heartbeats of anticipation, Chai-amorn Kaewwiboonpan, also known among fans as “Ammy The Bottom Blues”, took steps towards a moment that would etch his name deeper into the annals of controversy. By his side, Thanaphat Kapheng, a young man whose life was about to take a dramatic turn. Their destination? The grand halls of the Criminal Court, where fate awaited with its unyielding verdict.

The air inside the courtroom was thick with tension as the judge delivered a ruling that would send ripples across the nation – four years of confinement for Ammy, and one year for his younger accomplice, Thanaphat. Their offense? A fiery act of rebellion that saw the portrait of His Majesty the King enveloped in flames, an act they documented and boldly shared in 2021. Dreams of freedom were momentarily dashed as the option of suspended sentences was denied outright, prompting an immediate plea for bail as they braced for an appeal.

The incident that landed them in the cradle of justice unfolded on an evening draped in darkness outside the Klongprem Central Prison in Chatuchak district. With hearts heavy and spirits ignited, Chai-amorn and Thanaphat doused the royal portrait in kerosene and lit a match, an illuminating protest against the imprisonment of fellow activist Parit Chiwarak, affectionately known as Penguin. This fiery spectacle was not just an act of defiance but a call to arms, a beacon for change that Ammy felt compelled to share with the world through his Facebook page, The Bottom Blues.

Despite their protestations of noble intentions and a desire for nothing more than to voice support for a friend in chains, the court found little sympathy. The duo’s efforts to advocate for the release of Penguin, and perhaps a larger plea for reform within the royal institution, were lost amidst the flames that engulfed His Majesty’s portrait. To the court, this act was not just a transgression but a direct affront to the monarch, a threat painted in flames that sought to dishonor and discredit.

Chai-amorn, at 34, stood at the crossroads of artistry and activism, his online post flagged as a national security threat, netting him not just the charge of lese majeste but also of violating computer crime laws. Originally facing six years, his sentence was reduced to four in light of his confession, a silver lining in a dark cloud. Thanaphat, merely 18 yet at a juncture most daunting, saw his sentence shaved to one year from one and a half, his youth and confession earning him a measure of leniency.

In a world where the canvas of protest is painted in broad strokes of controversy, Chai-amorn and Thanaphat stand as figures emblematic of a generation’s strife and struggles. Their story, etched in the flames that dared challenge an ancient institution, serves as a testament to the power of expression and the price of defiance in an era where the line between activism and offense is both jagged and delicate.


  1. LibertyVoice May 27, 2024

    It’s absolutely vital to understand the importance of freedom of speech and protest in any society. While I don’t condone violence or destruction, the punishment seems excessively harsh. It’s a sad day when lighting a portrait lands you years in prison.

    • TraditionGuard May 27, 2024

      You’re missing the point. It’s not about a simple portrait; it’s a matter of respecting the symbols of the nation and its leaders. The monarchy is a cornerstone of Thai culture and should be protected from defamation.

      • LibertyVoice May 27, 2024

        I respect your viewpoint but disagree. Respecting cultural symbols shouldn’t come at the cost of human rights. Punishing dissent with prison sets a dangerous precedent for any democracy or monarchy.

    • RealTalk May 27, 2024

      But where do we draw the line? Today it’s a portrait, tomorrow it could be any criticism seen as dissent. We can’t just blanket every act under ‘protection of cultural symbols.’

  2. PennyThoughts May 27, 2024

    I’m all for artistic expression, but this was reckless. There are other ways to protest or support a cause without resorting to property damage. This isn’t a clear-cut case of freedom of speech.

  3. Joe May 27, 2024

    To those sympathizing with Ammy and Thanaphat, would you say the same if the portrait was of someone you respected? Sometimes actions have consequences.

    • QuestionEverything May 27, 2024

      Respect shouldn’t be imposed through fear or punishment. Yes, actions have consequences, but the consequences need to be just and fair. Four years for a protest act seems disproportionate to the ‘crime.’

  4. FreedomFighter101 May 27, 2024

    In a world where silence is often confused with peace, the voices of Ammy and Thanaphat echoed a demand for change. Their courage to stand against oppressive laws, at the cost of personal freedom, should inspire, not condemn.

    • SensibleThinker May 27, 2024

      Inspire what exactly? More acts of rebellion that end in imprisonment? Courage without wisdom is recklessness. They could have found smarter ways to protest.

      • FreedomFighter101 May 27, 2024

        Smart protests often go unnoticed. Sometimes, a stronger statement is required to draw attention to oppressive systems. It’s easy to judge from the sidelines.

      • JustObserving May 27, 2024

        Drawing attention at the cost of personal freedom is a high price to pay. Whether it was worth it is subjective, but let’s not glorify imprudence.

  5. JJSmith May 27, 2024

    What happened to diplomacy? Setting a fire outside a prison is dangerous and could’ve hurt someone. Supporting your friends is one thing, but this is extreme.

    • ArtLover May 27, 2024

      Art and activism often require bold statements. Perhaps it was extreme, but so are the laws that imprison individuals for their art and speech.

  6. RighteousCoder May 27, 2024

    The crackdown on digital protest and activism is a concerning trend. Chai-amorn’s post being flagged as a national security threat shows how broad and dangerous these laws against cybercrime have become.

    • CyberSage May 27, 2024

      Exactly, the broad application of computer crime laws to stifle dissent is alarming. It’s a slippery slope from here to extensive censorship and control over all digital expression.

  7. GlobalWatcher May 27, 2024

    Other countries need to pay attention. Today it’s Thailand, tomorrow it could be anywhere. Activists everywhere are under threat, and international solidarity is crucial.

  8. HistoryBuff May 27, 2024

    Understanding Thai culture and the legal implications of lese majeste laws is important before jumping to conclusions. This isn’t about the right or wrong of protest but about respecting the law of the land.

    • LibertyVoice May 27, 2024

      Laws that suppress free speech and activism should be challenged, not blindly followed. Historical context is crucial, but it shouldn’t be used to justify injustice.

  9. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »