Press "Enter" to skip to content

Budget Delay Impact: CGD’s Patricia Mongkhonvanit Reveals Fiscal Year Shortfalls and Solutions

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online
File photo of the Comptroller General's Department

The Comptroller General’s Department (CGD) has made revelations regarding the previous fiscal year’s budget underspending, attributing it to the prolonged delay in budget approval. According to CGD director-general Patricia Mongkhonvanit, the late passing of the state budget created quite a ripple effect.

The fiscal year 2024, which concluded on September 30, saw significant usage of the fixed fund, totaling 2.8 trillion baht, primarily designated for crucial expenses such as civil service salaries. Remarkably, this segment was over-disbursed by 101%, exceeding expectations.

On the other hand, the investment portion of the budget painted a different picture. The government managed to disburse only 440 billion baht, which accounts for just 65.1% of the available funds. This figure lagged 10 percentage points behind the 75% target, revealing a clear underperformance.

The unallocated portion of the investment fund hasn’t gone to waste, though. Ms. Patricia noted that the leftover funds have been redirected to bolster the budget for the ongoing fiscal year’s first and second quarters, stretching up until March.

The previous national budget amassed a staggering 3.4 trillion baht. Unfortunately, the approval delays, rooted in the protracted government formation following the 2023 elections, meant the budget bill didn’t see the light of day until April—seven months into the fiscal year. This lag sorely hampered various agencies’ abilities to launch and execute investment projects within the intended timeline.

Breaking down the fiscal targets, Ms. Patricia explained that last year’s minimum spending threshold for the fixed fund was set at 98% of available resources, while the investment portion was pegged at 75%. In contrast, this year’s target for the fixed fund spending remains steady at 98%, aiming to avoid another scenario of underutilization or over-disbursement.

It’s clear that while the government made sure civil service and fixed expenses were robustly funded, the investment fund’s lagging performance underscores the challenges posed by administrative delays, and there’s a lot riding on ensuring the current fiscal year’s budgets hit their marks without such hitches. The hope is that agencies will ride out this fiscal year’s budget more smoothly, avoiding the pitfalls of the previous year.

37 Comments

  1. Samantha89 October 2, 2024

    So the CGD managed to spend all their fixed funds but dropped the ball on investments? Typical government inefficiency!

    • Mark T. October 2, 2024

      I think it’s more about the budget delays than inefficiency. It’s hard to launch projects without the funds being approved.

      • EconomicsProf October 2, 2024

        Budget approval delays are a political problem, but the real issue is prioritization. Fixed funds go first because they are politically safer.

      • Samantha89 October 2, 2024

        Still, it’s frustrating. They should have contingency plans for these delays. Investing in infrastructure is critical!

    • Lisa October 2, 2024

      Investments always get cut first. It’s unfortunate, but in times of uncertainty, governments play it safe.

      • Samantha89 October 2, 2024

        But playing it safe doesn’t create jobs or grow the economy. We need those investments.

        • Joe October 2, 2024

          Agreed. By pulling back on investments, they’re slowing down long-term economic growth.

    • Grower134 October 2, 2024

      It’s all about political gains. Civil service salaries win votes, investment projects are just bonuses.

      • Mark T. October 2, 2024

        Except investment projects also create opportunities and infrastructure for future economic growth. We can’t just overlook that.

  2. Melisa October 2, 2024

    I’m curious how other countries manage budget delays. There has to be a better system!

    • Jane P. October 2, 2024

      Some countries have rolling budgets or advanced disbursement schemes. It helps avoid these kinds of bottlenecks.

    • AnalyticTruth October 2, 2024

      It’s about effective planning and political will. Our system is too rigid and reactive.

  3. BigMike October 2, 2024

    Why don’t they teach about how these budget issues affect us regular people in school? Seems like something we should all know.

    • TeacherLisa October 2, 2024

      It’s partly because budget issues are complex, and curriculums are already packed. But I agree, financial literacy is crucial.

    • BigMike October 2, 2024

      It’s just frustrating. We should be better informed so we can hold our leaders accountable.

  4. Donovan October 2, 2024

    Patricia Mongkhonvanit seems to be fairly transparent about the budget shortfall. At least they’re acknowledging the issues.

    • TruthSeeker October 2, 2024

      Acknowledging is one thing, but what’s the action plan? Announcing shortfalls is only step one.

    • Samantha89 October 2, 2024

      Exactly. Talking about the problem isn’t the same as solving it.

  5. CuriousCat October 2, 2024

    Will this reallocation of funds to the new fiscal year actually help, or is it just a band-aid solution?

    • Robert P. October 2, 2024

      It might help in the short term, but without addressing the root cause of delays, it will happen again.

    • Paul October 2, 2024

      They need structural changes to avoid these delays. Reallocation is just kicking the can down the road.

  6. Larry D October 2, 2024

    This problem is systemic. The budget process needs a complete overhaul, but good luck getting politicians to agree on that!

    • Nina October 2, 2024

      So true. Everyone knows the system is broken, but no one wants to take the tough steps to fix it.

    • Larry D October 2, 2024

      It’s just easier for them to maintain the status quo. More accountability is needed.

  7. EconomicsProf October 2, 2024

    Maybe it’s time to consider a mixed approach—fixed disbursements for non-flexible expenses and rolling budgets for investments.

    • Melisa October 2, 2024

      That sounds logical. It would allow more flexibility and potentially avoid these kinds of shortfalls.

  8. Bonnie October 2, 2024

    Wait, they overspent on fixed funds but underspent on investment? How does that even happen?

    • Fred October 2, 2024

      Strictly allocated funds. Each segment has its own rules and timelines. It’s a bureaucratic nightmare.

    • Bonnie October 2, 2024

      Seems like common sense is missing here. Can’t they adjust on the fly?

  9. AnalyticTruth October 2, 2024

    This shows the inherent flaws in our political system. Delays in government formation should not cripple our fiscal health.

    • Donovan October 2, 2024

      Reforming the political system is easier said than done. Too many vested interests.

    • AnalyticTruth October 2, 2024

      That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. Pressure from citizens can bring about change.

  10. Paul October 2, 2024

    Investment misallocation affects everyone. We need those projects for economic growth!

  11. flowerpicker October 2, 2024

    Can’t believe they didn’t hit the 75% mark for investments. What a mess!

  12. Jerry L. October 2, 2024

    How are these delays still happening? We’ve had budget issues for years.

  13. Lisa October 2, 2024

    They always find a way to mess things up. We need to demand more transparency.

  14. grower134 October 2, 2024

    Budgets are inherently political. Fixing these issues requires systemic change.

  15. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »