Sirikanya Tansakul, deputy leader of the election-winning, opposition-core Move Forward Party (MFP), is poised to usher in a revolutionary new chapter in Thai politics. If Ms Sirikanya ascends to the leadership of the MFP’s planned reincarnation following a potential disbandment by court order, Thailand could see a dramatic shift towards increased female political leadership, a refreshing change from the male-dominated past.
“There will be a new dimension of Thai politics, unlike the past when most political leaders were men,” Ms Sirikanya remarked with a confident smile during a press conference on Monday. Her words echoed the sentiments of many who crave a more inclusive political landscape.
After the release of an MFP video detailing the potential disbandment case, reporters were eager to know more about the possibility of Ms Sirikanya taking the helm of a new party. She responded with a thoughtful, “That will depend on the party.”
“If an untoward incident occurs, members will be ready to move to a new house… No matter what happens, we are well prepared,” she assured, hinting at the resilience and preparedness that defines the MFP. However, she noted that any new party would remain unnamed for the time being.
Meanwhile, as the country awaits the crucial Constitutional Court ruling, MFP has called upon its supporters to rally at their headquarters on August 7. In a heartfelt invitation posted on Facebook, they encouraged everyone to don their party shirts and converge for a show of solidarity.
On this significant day, Progressive Movement secretary-general Piyabutr Saengkanokkul is set to deliver a compelling lecture on the Constitutional Court and the disbandment of political parties. A key figure in Thai politics, Mr Piyabutr previously served as the secretary-general of the now-dissolved Future Forward Party, which later evolved into MFP.
Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn, an MFP list MP, suggested that congregating at the party’s headquarters would be more convenient for supporters. He emphatically denied that this invitation was intended to exert pressure on the court.
The Constitutional Court’s impending ruling, expected on August 7, centers around a petition submitted by the Election Commission (EC) in March. The court had accepted this petition for review on April 3. The petition accuses MFP of violating Section 92 of the organic law on political parties, arguing that the party’s attempt to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code—Thailand’s lese-majeste law—demonstrates a potentially destabilizing challenge to the constitutional monarchy.
The EC has not only requested the dissolution of the MFP but also seeks to impose stringent political bans on the party’s executives, barring them from future elections and preventing them from founding or leading any new party for the next decade.
In the previous general election, the MFP emerged victorious but was stymied from wielding power due to opposition from the junta-appointed Senate. Subsequently, the Pheu Thai Party, which came in second, was able to form the government.
I’m really excited to see what Sirikanya Tansakul will bring to Thai politics. It’s about time we see more female leaders. Go MFP!
You’re being overly optimistic. The Thai political system is too entrenched for one person to make a difference.
Somsak, your cynicism is disappointing. Every change starts somewhere, and Sirikanya could be the catalyst we need.
Exactly, Marisa! And MFP has already shown resilience and innovation. Let’s give them a chance.
I agree with Somsak. Even if she becomes the leader, she’ll face too many obstacles. The system is rigged.
MFP’s approach to challenge Section 112 is commendable. Free speech must be protected!
You’re talking nonsense. Section 112 is vital to our national security. MFP’s actions are reckless.
Reckless? Or progressive? Times are changing, and our laws should too!
Sirikanya for PM! A new era for Thailand with more women in power.
The Constitutional Court is just a puppet for the military. They’ll dissolve MFP just like they did Future Forward.
That’s a harsh claim. The Court is supposed to be independent. Let’s wait for the ruling.
But Anurak has a point. The track record speaks for itself.
Exactly, Ahmad. It’s all about maintaining power. MFP poses a threat to their control.
Rallying supporters right before the court’s decision seems like a pressure tactic to me.
It’s not pressure, it’s solidarity. Showing the court that people support MFP isn’t the same as forcing their hand.
It’s quite brave of Sirikanya to take this step despite likely facing political bans. True dedication to the cause.
Bravery or foolhardiness? If they get banned, it’s game over for her politically.
And yet she’s still stepping up. That shows real resolve.
The EC’s move seems politically motivated. They’re clearly trying to suppress MFP’s influence.
Changing leadership isn’t going to fix the core issues. The whole system needs an overhaul.
True, but leadership change can be the first step towards broader reforms.
I don’t trust Piyabutr Saengkanokkul. His involvement just complicates things further.
Reforming Section 112 is a dangerous move. It could destabilize the entire nation.
Sirikanya and MFP are the fresh air Thai politics desperately needs. Enough of old, corrupt politicians.
Fresh air? More like a storm. They’re too radical!
I still can’t believe MFP was stymied by the Senate. It’s outrageous!
That’s how the system is set up, unfortunately. Change won’t come easy.
A female leader would be such an inspiration to young girls across Thailand. Go Sirikanya!
Inspiration doesn’t change laws or fix corruption. We need more than just feel-good stories.
Thai politics needs more transparency. MFP seems like the right party for that job.
The military needs to stay out of politics. Every decision they influence is biased.
The military has always been a part of Thai politics. It’s not going to change anytime soon.
Anan is right. Historically, the military’s involvement dates back decades.