Picture this: a modern financial saga unraveling in the heart of Thailand, where the whispers of economic urgency brush against the palms of legislative processes. There’s a buzz that bounces off the golden temples and into the streets, a buzz that’s all about the staggering figure of 500 billion baht. The center of this tale? None other than the digital wallet scheme, a topic hotter than the Thai sun that could either burn bright or fizzle out, depending on whom you’re asking.
In one corner, we have reports from various nooks of the media landscape—the scores of websites and TV stations that have their eyes and ears everywhere, who claim with a sense of certainty that the Council of State, Thailand’s sage legal advisors, are not exactly on board with this audacious 500-billion baht bill.
The storyline they relay goes something like this: an anonymous but seemingly knowledgeable source from the Council of State supposedly dropped a truth bomb, saying that if things were really that dire economically, then the government should opt for an executive decree, not a bill. It’s that age-old dilemma of “to borrow or not to borrow,” with a twist—the Constitutional tangle that could result from borrowing without immediately securing a way to pay it back in the next annual budget.
But here’s where the plot thickens. Enter the comeback kid, Julapun, with his contrasting account that’s causing quite the stir. Julapun tells a different tale—one where the Council of State could be seen nodding in approval under the warm glow of Articles 53 and 57 from the 2018 State Fiscal and Financial Discipline Act, which, in short, may allow for such unanticipated loans in the face of urgent, critical problems.
Divine intervention through legislature? Perhaps. According to Julapun, these statutes could be the white knights of the digital wallet scheme—Article 53 riding gallantly with its promise of off-budget loans for problems too urgent to wait, and Article 57 beaconing from the horizon with a green light for borrowing that backs socially valuable projects.
And it seems there’s more than just rules and regulations—they’ve got advice in their arsenal. Julapun illustrates the Council of State as the wise old men of this story, bestowing upon the government the sage counsel of considering stakeholder opinions before bringing down the gavel on the bill.
“The government will take all the steps as advised by the Council of State,” Julapun assures us with the confidence of someone who knows the ending of the book. “Tomorrow, the oracle that is the Finance Ministry will unveil the Council of State’s prophecy to the Cabinet.”
Meanwhile, the digital wallet scheme’s puppeteers, the ones working the strings behind this monetary provision, are orchestrating a timeline, aiming to get this show on the road by none other than the first of May. And why wouldn’t they? Julapun’s conviction could light up Bangkok’s skyline—he’s all in, chips to the center of the table kind of deal.
Now let’s not forget who’s really driving the bus on this campaign promise—it’s the ruling Pheu Thai Party at the steering wheel. Their promise is to deliver 10,000 baht into the digital wallets of every qualified Thai citizen over 16, affecting undoubtedly millions of life stories across the nation for those earning under 70,000 baht a month and with lighter bank accounts, smaller than a half-million isthmus.
It’s a story of money, power, governance, and the hopes of the common person—of flashy digital dreams and the brass tacks of law. But as any seasoned storyteller knows, it’s the journey to the last page, the climax, and not the happily ever after, that makes for a tale worth remembering.
Be First to Comment