Nattawut Saikuar, a seasoned advisor to the prime minister, is urging a pause on anti-government rallies, pointing out the looming threat of unconstitutional power grabs. His concerns are directed at Sondhi Limthongkul, a former leader of the yellow-shirt movement and renowned media figure, who has hinted at organizing regular events next year—a move some believe could spark widespread protests against the Pheu Thai-led government.
This tension traces back to a controversial 2001 memorandum of understanding (MoU) between Thailand and Cambodia, involving joint resource development in the Gulf of Thailand. As the government contemplates negotiations with Cambodia on sharing these resources, critics are rallying for the MoU’s revocation, reflecting public skepticism about the agreement.
Taking to Facebook, Nattawut, a one-time stalwart of the red shirt movement—the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship—expressed his doubts about imminent street protests against the government. “While some factions might be swayed by nationalist calls, this doesn’t align with the broader population’s interests,” he remarked, highlighting that government dialogues with Cambodia over maritime disputes remain on hold.
Nattawut also drew attention to the potential pitfalls of anti-government movements. “Past demonstrations against administrations like Thai Rak Thai and Pheu Thai led to unlawful power overthrows,” he warned, referencing the coups of 2006 and 2014. He reaffirmed the government’s commitment to dialogue over confrontation, hinting that the prime minister would soon reveal the administration’s accomplishments and economic strategies after completing 90 days in office on December 12.
The air of uncertainty was further fueled at a Sunday forum at Thammasat University’s Tha Prachan campus. Sondhi, once at the helm of the now-defunct People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD), slammed Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, accusing her of ignorance and legal indifference. He advocated equipping citizens with knowledge and mooted the idea of organizing monthly public forums from next year, interpreted by many as a tactical move to challenge the government.
In a recent press interaction, Sondhi, now 77, remained ambiguous about orchestrating street protests, suggesting that while it might not yet be necessary, the nation is inching closer to that juncture.
As the political chess game unfolds, with all its nuanced threats and tactical maneuvers, Thailand finds itself at a critical juncture. The stakes are high, and as the government charts its course, all eyes remain peeled for the next strategic move, both from within the parliament and from the voices on the streets.
Nattawut is right to worry! Sondhi’s protests in the past have only led to chaos. Why risk it again?
It’s chaos for some, but for others, these protests are a way to voice legitimate grievances. Protests aren’t inherently bad.
But what about the danger of coups? Let’s protect our democracy first and talk about grievances later.
Both democracy and freedom of speech are crucial. Ignoring people won’t end well for the government.
Sondhi’s forums could be a breath of fresh air or just more political theatrics. People should critically assess these movements.
Shouldn’t Thailand focus on more pressing issues like poverty and education instead of these endless political dramas?
Politics is how we solve those issues, Cherry. You can’t just ignore it.
True, but endless rallies don’t seem to solve anything. We need solutions, not spectacles.
I can’t believe Sondhi is still in the game at 77! But does he really have the national interest at heart, or just his own legacy?
Past coups were disastrous! I hope we can talk this out before things escalate again.
Naive to think dialogue is enough. Sometimes protests are necessary to hold power accountable.
Protests are fine, but not when they lead to military takeovers. That’s my fear.
If Sondhi wants to educate the public, why not start with transparency in his own dealings? Irony much?
Actually, joint resource development could be beneficial for both Thailand and Cambodia, if managed correctly. Why all the hate towards the MoU?
As an outsider, it seems like Thailand’s stuck in a loop of protests and power struggles. When will this cycle be broken?
It’s complex, Sam. Change takes time, but we are working towards a more stable future.
Politics in Thailand seems like a never-ending soap opera. Just when you think it’s calm, drama comes back.
Instead of blaming Sondhi, focus should be on government’s accountability. People have the right to protest if they’re being ignored.
Economic strategy after 90 days in office? That sounds promising. Hope it tackles the root causes of discontent.
Mark my words, forums will turn into something bigger. Sondhi’s not new to the game and knows how to rally a crowd.
Can someone explain why maritime disputes with Cambodia are so contentious?
It’s about resources, Gary. Both nations want oil and gas rights. Strategic and economically crucial.
I dream of a Thailand where everyone can express their views without fear of military intervention. Is it too much to ask?
Dreaming is good, but what’s the plan to get there, Danny? Democracy isn’t just about dreams.
Anyone else skeptical of Nattawut’s sudden anti-protest stance? Politicians can flip when it suits them.
The reference to past coups is a strong point. History repeats itself. We need to learn from it.
Or make history instead of just learning. We should focus on building resilient institutions.
The real question is: what defines legitimacy in government? The presence of power or the will of the people?
Still proud of the Red Shirts and what they stand for, but Nattawut’s call for calm can’t be ignored as naive.
Someone in politics actually advocating for peace? About time we saw something like this.
Peace is good, but justice must follow too. Quiet isn’t always progress.
With everything going on, would love to see a grassroots movement that truly represents the people.
Not sure how I feel about all this. Need more info before taking a stance. Watching closely.