If you’ve ever marveled at the sprawling greens of Alpine Golf Club in Pathum Thani, it’s not just the well-kept fairways that might catch your attention. This verdant 900-rai expanse isn’t just a golfer’s paradise; it’s the focal point of a land dispute that would make even the most sedate golf enthusiasts raise an eyebrow.
On a rather eventful Wednesday, the Department of Lands (DoL) clarified the swirling rumors regarding the club’s land title deeds. These title deeds, tied to the land housing both the golf club and a chic residential area, were reported to have been in peril of nullification. But contrary to media buzz, no legal hammer had fallen yet. Should the ownership be legally undone, the land would revert to monastic ownership, raising visions of compensation for all parties involved, including those nestled comfortably in the housing complex. Well, at least something to putt over while sipping on your morning coffee.
The plot thickens — both literally and metaphorically — with the Shinawatra family holding the majority shares in the company managing the club. It’s a complex tapestry woven with intricacies worthy of a country club’s hushed conversation over tea.
“Hold your golf carts! No signatures have been inked to nullify any deeds as yet,” exclaimed DoL’s director-general, Pornpoth Penpas, in response to the media chatter. His assurance came as a stiff breeze of relief amid reports swirling like an unpredictable typhoon, whispering of an impending order signed by Chada Thaised, a notable Bhumjaithai Party member.
Mr. Thaised, who had a tenure as the deputy interior minister until recently, allegedly signed off on the paperwork directing the nullification of these contentious deeds before his exit. “Just a prudent reminder,” murmured Mr. Pornpoth, perhaps akin to a gentle tap-in putt, highlighting Thaised’s cautious approach when engaging the DoL on this hot potato issue. Yet, the mantle of authority for finally wielding the pen of nullification rests squarely on the shoulders of Chamnanwit Terat, the incumbent deputy secretary for the interior.
Meanwhile, the saga mixes a dash of politics with the green — Anutin Charnvirakul, the charismatic Bhumjaithai leader and current interior minister, has abstained from delving into the Alpine conundrum. One could only wonder if he’s strategizing his next tee-off or charting a shrewd political course of inaction.
Historically, the land has its own tale to tell. Gifted by the generous Noem Chamnanchartsakda to Wat Dhammamikaramvoraviharn, a serene temple in Prachuap Khiri Khan, as far back as 1971, it stands as a testament to charitable aspirations. Yet, plot twists followed her passing, as the Mahamongkut Ratchawittayalai Foundation, executors of her estate, sold the land to the current stakeholders, Alpine Real Estate, and Alpine Golf and Sports Club.
The political fairways see Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, whose connection to Alpine was familial and financial, as she once held a significant swath of shares — 22.41 million, to be exact. However, approaching her political deadline, she neatly transferred her financial stake to her mother, Khunying Potjaman na Pombejra, paving an uncomplicated political path littered with long-lofted drives of intrigue.
The shareholder leaderboard shuffled as of September 4, 2024, listing Khunying Potjaman, Panthongtae Shinawatra, and Pinthongta Shinawatra Kunakornwong among the major ballplayers, each holding shares comparable to hefty tournament winnings — 29.88 million, 22.42 million, and 22.41 million respectively.
The Alpine saga is teed up at the intersection of lush greens, monastic legacies, and the ever-perplexing world of politics. The game isn’t over until the last putt drops. So, stick around, keep your binoculars ready, and prepare to enjoy the spectacle unfold — albeit, with a little less golf and a lot more swing in courtroom dramas.
Why is a golf club even built on land that was once gifted to a temple? It’s disrespectful!
I think there’s nothing wrong as long as the land was legally sold. It’s not being wasted!
Legality doesn’t always equal morality, you know?
It seems like an issue of public interest, considering the historical value.
It’s just a bunch of elitists squabbling over their playground. They should just make it public land again.
Turning it public won’t fix anything unless the management changes too. Ever seen how some public courses are maintained?
True, but at least let more people enjoy it if they’re going to fight over it.
Not all golf enthusiasts are elitists. The real issue is about legal transparency.
Does anyone else think it’s shady how politicians are involved? Feels like we’re not hearing the full story.
Of course! Politicians always have hidden agendas. They probably want the land for personal gain.
It’s not really surprising given how interconnected their interests are with business.
The laws surrounding land ownership should be more robust to prevent such messes. It’s not rocket science!
True, but how often does the law prevent issues vs creating them?
It’s disheartening to see land meant for religious purposes end up causing so much conflict.
Let’s be honest, this is about the money, not land or religion. That’s why this will drag on forever.
Exactly, follow the money trail, and the truth will be revealed.
The Shinawatra family should step back from this golf club and its politics. It’s too controversial.
If they’ve invested millions in shares, why should they step back? They’re stakeholders like everyone else.
Shouldn’t nature and historical preservation be considered foremost in this dispute?
Exactly! Why isn’t there more attention on the preservation angle? It’s important.
A legal resolution is the only thing that can sort out this mess.
But the legal system is influenced too, who ensures a fair trial?
All of this and none of it really solves where the land SHOULD go. It’s all a game.
Doesn’t anybody care about the people already living there? Their homes are in limbo.
If nullification happens, they should sue for compensation. It’s their right.
Honestly, the inconsistency of the government with such issues is really what’s at stake for all citizens.
Government inconsistency is a disease everywhere today.
At the end, it feels like it’s a story of inequality, where a few benefit more than many. Disheartens regular folks.