Whispers of injustice and a broken promise to preserve life have stirred public sentiment this month, as the National Institute for Emergency Medicine (NIEM) and the Department of Health Service Support (DHSS) dive headfirst into a conundrum that has set social media ablaze. The tale unfolds with a claim so egregious it’s hard to remain impassive: A private hospital, nestled within the bustling heart of our community, stands accused of rejecting a gravely ill Taiwanese tourist in his most desperate hour—a decision with fatal consequences.
No stone left unturned, Acting Sub Lt Karun Sriwattanaburapa, the assistant spokesman for the NIEM, has emerged as the herald of a thorough investigation. Echoing through the corridors of commitment, the laws of the land ensure a clarion call to action: Section 28 of the Emergency Medicine Act and Section 36 of the Health Facility Act bind hospitals, private or public, to provide timely medical aid to those in emergency’s throes without prejudice towards their insurance cover or wallet’s weight.
This mandate comes from no lesser authority than the Public Health Minister Cholnan Srikaew himself, in the wake of an outcry propelled by digital platforms. The tragedy at this story’s heart is personified in Chen, a name now synonymous with an international plea for compassion gone unheard. Felled by an inebriated driver’s reckless abandon, the Taiwanese tourist lay stricken, a silent testament to a hit-and-run that fades into the night but not memory.
On that fateful December night, at Phatthanakan Soi 50, amid the cold impersonality of asphalt, a beacon from the Ruamkatanyu Foundation found Chen. It was 1.50am, a time when dreams ordinarily dance, but for Chen, reality had dealt a crippling blow. The anonymous streets bore witness as life’s breath was painstakingly coaxed back into him, only to meet the disheartening rebuke of a private hospital’s gatekeepers—a supervisor and a nurse whose words would reverberate with undeniable controversy. Their claim: a financial gamble not worth the wager.
The alternative—a public sanctuary known as Sirindhorn Hospital—opened its arms too late. Chen’s battle was lost, claims were cast, and now the search for truth marches on.
Yet, in this whirlwind of accusation and defense, Acting Sub Lt Karun hints at complexity behind the scenes. Could it have been a quirk of fate that the private facility was already at its brim? Or perhaps other, more nebulous factors at play? It’s a puzzle that those at Erawan Centre had sought to unravel, only to have the pieces slip further away.
Nonetheless, the rule remains unambiguous and critical to understand: An unconscious patient is always critical, always an emergency, always deserving of utmost urgency. To abdicate such a fundamental responsibility is to risk the harshest of penalties—a two-year dance with imprisonment’s shadow or a 40,000 baht wallop to the wallet.
As the guardians of health and safety weave this intricate tapestry of investigation, we wait. Will this be a tale of vindication or culpability? The answer lies in the hands of those committed to justice and humanity’s collective trust in the sanctity of life and law.
Be First to Comment