Press "Enter" to skip to content

Anutin Charnvirakul’s Bold Push to Protect Village and Sub-District Headmen in Thai Legislation

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

In the heart of the bustling Thai parliament, a group of determined individuals stands at the forefront of a cause that resonates deeply with many rural communities. Anutin Charnvirakul, the formidable interior minister and leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, flanked by his party’s spirited representatives, proudly marches towards Deputy House Speaker Paradorn Prissanananthakul. Their mission? To submit two crucial bills aiming to amend the Local Administration Act. It’s a Wednesday to remember, as captured in a vibrant photograph shared by the Bhumjaithai Party.

These legislative proposals, backed by the Bhumjaithai Party, hold a singular vision: safeguarding the essential roles of village and sub-district headmen within municipalities. Anutin Charnvirakul passionately champions the necessity of these roles, underscoring their importance in fostering effective collaboration with the local populace.

The urgency of this mission stems from a sobering ruling by the Administrative Court. The verdict dictates the elimination of village headmen, or phuyai ban, and sub-district headmen, referred to as kamnan, if a municipality undergoes a transformation to a town, known as thesaban muang, accommodating at least 10,000 citizens, or to a city, known as thesaban nakhon, bustling with 50,000 or more. Under the existing Local Administration Act, these esteemed positions are set to be dissolved within a year of a municipality’s status change.

Yet, Anutin stands firm against this impending disappearance. “We still want the positions of phuyai ban and kamnan to be retained in their municipal areas because we believe that they can help take care of people’s well-being,” Mr. Anutin asserts, his conviction unwavering. “They can also assist in coordinating efforts with the municipality to make things easier for residents.” For him and his party, the strength of local governance lies in the hands of these devoted leaders.

In a bid to rally political support, Anutin has engaged in extensive dialogues with both opposition and coalition parties. The consensus emerging from these discussions is clear: amending the law is a move that promises tangible benefits for the Thai people. He holds hopes high that when the parliamentary session resumes on December 12, all parties will champion this amendment in solidarity.

The brewing momentum behind this legislative push finds its roots in a heartfelt plea. On October 29, the Association of Village Headmen submitted a fervent letter advocating for the retention of these vital roles. This appeal struck a chord within the Bhumjaithai Party, propelling the issue to the forefront during a pivotal party meeting on October 30.

Amplifying this call to action, Korawee Prissananantakul, a stalwart member of the party’s executive committee and a dedicated MP for Ang Thong, lends his voice to the narrative. “When the party’s leadership learned of the matter, they brought it up during a meeting on Oct 30 and resolved to proceed with the bills,” recounts Korawee. His words are imbued with a message of reassurance to village and sub-district headmen: their roles are indeed integral to the tapestry of local administration.

As the debate heats up, one thing is unmistakable: the Bhumjaithai Party stands resolute in their mission to preserve positions that serve as the backbone of community engagement and local governance. It is a testament to their unwavering commitment to the people they serve. With the political winds rising and the legislative stage set, the upcoming parliamentary session promises to be a defining moment in this captivating saga of advocacy and reform.

31 Comments

  1. Somsak T. October 31, 2024

    I think it’s great that Anutin is trying to protect these roles. Village headmen are crucial for rural communities!

    • mango234 October 31, 2024

      But aren’t these positions outdated? Maybe it’s time for change!

      • Somsak T. October 31, 2024

        They have deep roots in our culture. They know the local issues better than any outsider could.

      • Jirayu C. October 31, 2024

        Cultural importance shouldn’t override the need for efficient governance.

    • Farida M. October 31, 2024

      Anutin’s focus on local governance might be just a way to gain political favor.

  2. Nok Noi October 31, 2024

    Removing headmen due to population changes seems harsh. These roles still serve a purpose.

    • citylight88 October 31, 2024

      Yes, but cities should be managed like cities, not like villages.

  3. PoliticoPlayer October 31, 2024

    Interesting how Bhumjaithai is pushing this under the guise of ‘community service’.

  4. watchdawg47 October 31, 2024

    This is a blatant political move. Anutin’s prioritizing his party’s interests over real reform!

    • Kasem P. October 31, 2024

      You don’t know the man. He’s been advocating for communities for years.

    • watchdawg47 October 31, 2024

      Actions speak louder than past promises. Look at the current situation!

  5. Anchalee October 31, 2024

    I worry about Anutin’s influence if he succeeds. This could consolidate too much power locally.

  6. savvyCEO October 31, 2024

    Centralization vs. localization is the real debate here. Who should have more control? It’s a tricky balance.

  7. ruralvoice56 October 31, 2024

    In my village, the headman does more than any city official ever has.

    • urbanactivist October 31, 2024

      Sure, but not all headmen are as effective as yours. Consistency is key.

    • ruralvoice56 October 31, 2024

      Individual issues, not reasons to dismantle an entire system!

  8. Joey K. October 31, 2024

    We need to adapt to the new world. If cities grow, so should their governance systems.

  9. Grower123 October 31, 2024

    It’s just bureaucracy; more paperwork, less action.

  10. Saowanee October 31, 2024

    Without headmen, rural topics can be sidelined and ignored!

  11. Evergreen327 October 31, 2024

    Shouldn’t we be focusing on more urgent issues, like Thailand’s environmental policy?

    • Joe Scholar October 31, 2024

      Local governance is key to implementing any policy at the grassroots level, including environmental ones.

    • Evergreen327 October 31, 2024

      True, but headmen aren’t usually versed in environmental policy.

  12. Sirima October 31, 2024

    Preserving roles that help people is not a bad thing. It builds trust and local unity.

  13. Anek W. October 31, 2024

    This seems more about protecting a political base than actual reform.

    • truth98 October 31, 2024

      Do you have evidence for that claim? Or just speculations?

  14. pearllover99 October 31, 2024

    How about improving the existing structures instead of removing them entirely?

  15. Kantapong October 31, 2024

    The headmen are over-romanticized. More accountability is needed!

    • Nok Noi October 31, 2024

      Accountability is important, but removal isn’t the only way.

  16. Somchai October 31, 2024

    Why does this keep coming up year after year? Focus on future needs!

  17. lighthouse88 October 31, 2024

    Anutin’s approach might actually help streamline local government coordination with the central.

  18. raweewan1984 October 31, 2024

    I think it’s all just noise. They won’t change anything significant by this!

  19. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »