A stunning revelation has emerged surrounding Red Bull heir Vorayuth “Boss” Yoovidhya and the infamous 2012 hit-and-run case that left a policeman tragically dead. Former senior prosecutor Chainarong Saengthong-aram has come forward, declaring that his assistance to Mr. Vorayuth was an act stemming from deep compassion, as the young driver was a friend of his niece.
Chainarong is now one of eight defendants facing allegations of mishandling this highly scrutinized case. The controversy centers on accusations that he deliberately understated the speed of Mr. Vorayuth’s Ferrari at the time of the accident. Official estimates suggest the car was hurtling down the road at 177kph, but records were allegedly doctored to report a more palatable, legal speed of under 80kph.
As the clock ticks down to the trial, scheduled at the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases on September 10 at 9:30 am, Chainarong expressed a curious mix of relief and determination. “I am glad to have the opportunity to prove my innocence,” he asserted, pinning his hope on a fair trial. He lamented that agencies like the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) and the office of the attorney general had treated him unjustly.
Chainarong is determined to showcase how a critical video clip, used by both the NACC and the attorney general to incriminate him, had been tampered with. “I will file a counter-suit, amounting to seven cases, against the attorney general. These include accusations of misconduct and malicious persecution designed to subject me to criminal penalties,” he proclaimed defiantly.
When quizzed about the integrity of his actions regarding Mr. Vorayuth’s case, Chainarong firmly invoked the Criminal Procedure Code. “According to Section 134, the accused has the right to present facts in their favor,” he reasoned.
He further explained his motivation for stepping into the case, “I helped Mr. Vorayuth because he was a friend of my niece. Before getting involved, I researched Section 797 of the Civil and Commercial Code to ensure I had the legal right to intervene. It affirmed my capacity to act as a person, not as a prosecutor.”
In a poignant twist, Chainarong emphasized his humanity amid the legal jargon. “At that time, I was a prosecutor within the Criminal Division 6, which was outside the jurisdiction of Thonglor Police Station under the Bangkok South Criminal Court. Nonetheless, I am not just a prosecutor but a human being too. Is it wrong to help friends or family when the case does not fall under my official responsibility?” he pleaded.
Speculation about whether Chainarong received any form of compensation for his presumed kindness was promptly shot down. “I received nothing but a gracious courtesy for being a helpful friend,” he clarified. “I did not receive any money. Feel free to scrutinize my financial records,” he added with a tinge of pride.
This controversy-bathed case continues to unravel layers of intrigue and human complexity, painting a nuanced picture of loyalty, law, and ethical dilemmas. The upcoming trial promises to be a courtroom drama that will have people glued to the edge of their seats.
It’s unbelievable that he thinks it’s okay to alter evidence just because the person is a friend of his niece. That’s a clear abuse of power.
I agree, Joe. The law should be the same for everyone, no exceptions. How can we trust the justice system if people like Chainarong can manipulate it?
But what if it was you or your family? Would you just let them suffer if you had the power to help? The law sometimes needs a human touch.
James56, I get where you’re coming from, but altering evidence isn’t a ‘human touch’, it’s corruption.
Just because he didn’t personally benefit doesn’t make it right. Integrity in the justice system is non-negotiable.
Chainarong is right to defend himself if he’s being unjustly accused. Everyone deserves a fair trial.
Maybe so, but can you really call it a fair trial if he manipulated evidence in the first place?
B. Hamilton, exactly. The whole trial is compromised if such actions are allowed to go unpunished.
True, but we still need to hear him out. He claims the video was tampered with. That could change everything.
Even if the video was tampered with, the speed of the car was still way over the legal limit. Chainarong’s actions are indefensible.
The real issue here is that those with money and connections can bend the law. It’s disgusting.
Absolutely. If Vorayuth wasn’t a wealthy heir, he’d be in prison. No question about that.
OfficerMike, it’s sad but true. The double standards are glaringly obvious in cases like this.
And yet, Chainarong acts like he’s the victim here. The mind boggles.
Chainarong’s argument using Section 134 of the Criminal Procedure Code is technically correct, but it doesn’t justify altering evidence.
Exactly, Kate. Legal technicalities can’t hide unethical behavior.
Anyone feeling sympathy for Chainarong needs to remember there’s a dead policeman in all this. That’s the real tragedy.
Yes, Jeff. It’s appalling that the focus is on Chainarong’s ‘humanity’ when someone died because of their actions.
Why are we still surprised by such blatant misuse of power? This has been happening for ages and will continue unless there’s serious reform.
True, but it’s a tough battle. Those in power will always resist changes that limit their influence.
The whole niece argument is just a cover. Honestly, who buys that?
Chainarong’s attempt to paint himself as a human being swayed by compassion is just a smokescreen. No one buys it.
Is anyone checking the financial records, like Chainarong suggested? Follow the money trail!
What saddens me most is how ethics are thrown out the window when power and money are involved.
Chainarong’s counter-suits are a diversion tactic. He’s trying to confuse the issue.
Kids, this is a lesson on how not to behave when you grow up. Power and money can’t justify criminal acts.
His invocation of Section 797 is irrelevant. It doesn’t justify the alteration of critical evidence.
The fact that he admitted to helping Vorayuth is enough to raise serious suspicions about his ethical standards.
Even without money changing hands, his actions are inexcusable. Justice has to mean something.
How does Chainarong sleep at night knowing he perverted the course of justice?