In a world where the health of our planet is intimately connected to the health of its inhabitants, adopting a comprehensive approach is crucial for sustainable well-being. Dr. Soawapak Hinjoy, a leading figure in the field of public health, urges professionals in the environmental and health promotion sectors to synchronize their efforts under the One Health approach. This innovative strategy promises to yield healthier outcomes for the people of Thailand. These remarks were made during the dynamic “Climate and Health Regional Dialogue” forum, an event co-hosted by the Faculty of Tropical Medicine at Mahidol University and the French embassy.
The story of Thailand’s journey with the One Health approach dates back to around 2007, a year marked by a rabies epidemic that brought attention to the interconnectedness of health issues. Dr. Soawapak reminisces about how the Disease Control Department partnered with various agencies, adopting an integrated method to tackle and ultimately contain the outbreak. Since then, the One Health approach has evolved, and in 2014, the creation of the Thailand Coordinating Unit for One Health marked a milestone on this path. This unit is committed to a holistic approach in safeguarding the health of Thai residents, aligned with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of One Health.
According to the WHO, One Health is a comprehensive framework that aspires to sustainably balance and enhance the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems. It acknowledges the intricate and interconnected relationships between the health of humans, both domestic and wild animals, plants, and the vast natural environments. In this light, Dr. Soawapak emphasizes the need for seamless integration between the environmental and public health sectors as they implement the One Health approach in Thailand.
She passionately argues for collaboration, stressing, “In the journey towards a successful application of One Health in Thailand, it’s imperative that both sectors unite because health and climate change are inextricably linked.” Her call to action includes fostering an environment of information sharing among state agencies, which she believes could synergize data to predict and manage epidemics and disease spread with unprecedented accuracy.
Dr. Soawapak further highlights a common gap in understanding, noting, “When discussing public health, the conversation frequently circles back to diseases. Yet, the environmental sector might hesitate to involve themselves as it seems the terrain of medical personnel, be it doctors or veterinarians.” Her vision transcends such traditional boundaries, as she poignantly remarks, “By adopting a holistic perspective, we’ll recognize that climate change lies at the root of myriad health challenges. Thus, a paradigm shift is necessary in how we perceive health issues as they relate to the environment.”
This insightful message from Dr. Soawapak is both a call for unity and a beacon of hope. It’s a stern reminder that the health of our ecosystem is a tapestry we are all part of, and only by working together can we preserve it for the present and future generations. As the dialogue continues, Thailand stands poised to be a leader in the One Health initiative, setting an example for the world in crafting a healthier, more resilient planet. And so, the journey unfolds, with innovation, cooperation, and determination guiding the way.
I think the One Health approach is the future! It’s about time we realize how interconnected everything is.
But haven’t we always known this? It just feels like another excuse for more bureaucracy.
It’s not just bureaucracy. These frameworks raise awareness and drive research and funding to crucial areas.
I’m skeptical that this can work in practice. Coordination between sectors is a nightmare.
True, but isn’t it better to try than to ignore the problem altogether?
I guess, but how do we ensure everyone plays their part?
Real-world challenges are a part of any initiative. Better collaboration tech can help.
Does anyone else feel like this is only being pushed by those in academic circles? What about the common people?
Well, isn’t that the point? People in positions of power have the ability to implement these necessary changes.
Sure, but they often overlook the cultural and societal nuances of those they are trying to help.
The planet is suffering due to human activities. Change needs to start now, not later.
Easier said than done. These things take time and resources that some countries don’t have.
When ecosystems are healthier, humans will be too. It’s a no-brainer.
This is just more academic jargon. I see no real changes being implemented anywhere.
Actually, there are projects happening on local levels. Thailand’s example could serve as a global model.
I’ve read that traditional practices often include things like One Health, so maybe we’re just relearning lessons from the past.
Why focus on Thailand? There are bigger countries causing climate issues!
Small changes in one country can lead to big global impacts. Plus, it’s inspiring for others to follow suit.
If more nations followed One Health, we might stand a chance. We need global cooperation.
People always talk about collaboration but when it comes down to it, everyone loves their silos.
Breaking down silos is hard. That’s why it’s called ‘collaboration’, not individually doing work.
Dr. Hinjoy is tackling the root cause and that’s good, but I wonder if it really addresses urgent issues at hand.
Let’s face it, without political will, none of this matters. Politicians need to get on board.
They need to see the benefits, both economically and socially.
It all sounds great, but every initiative starts this way and ends up forgotten.
It’s those who don’t give up who change the world, though.
Thailand’s leadership on this should be celebrated, not questioned.
Agreed, but shouldn’t rigorous assessment of the outcomes be part of the celebration?
All these initiatives are great on paper, let’s hope it rolls out in a meaningful way this time.
I love how this approach validates the voices of indigenous people who have understood these connections for centuries.
I really hope more countries adopt this approach. The planet deserves better.