In the bustling heart of the city, a vibrant group from humble communities made their grievances heard before the stoic edifice of the finance ministry. It was Aug 17, and the air thrummed with their protest against the interim authority’s decision to bestow a monthly stipend solely to those advanced in age who checked off certain boxes on a bureaucratic list. The crowd was a tapestry of determination and heartfelt pleas, captured in a photograph that spoke volumes.
These community champions, the unsung heroes of our society, rallied anew on Thursday, bearing forth a legislative proposal fueled by the collective sigh of the poor. Their vision was simple: to uplift the modest 600 baht monthly sustenance for the elderly to a more humane figure of 3,000 baht. The petition brandished the weight of 43,826 souls, a testament to its pressing need in these trying times.
Upon the bill’s presentation, Deputy House Speaker Padipat Santipada became its custodian, vowing expedient delivery to the Halls of Deliberation within the esteemed House of Representatives. Nimit Tienudom, a beacon of hope amidst the activists, disclosed their trio of past attempts spanning a decade—each a seed that blossomed into the universal pension system we witness today.
In the wake of economic turbulence, the cry for income security in one’s twilight years has never echoed more profoundly. Amidst these echoes, the group calls upon Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin to grasp this bill with grace and wield it as a valiant instrument in the crusade to elevate the populace’s welfare.
Ismael Chuayphrik, aged 70, hailing from Ban Dan Lot, a quiet nook in Phatthalung’s southern lushness, voiced the silent apprehension of many: the haunting specter of retracted political vows—the promised pension uplift now a mere whisper in the corridors of power. The pressing needs of life post-retirement seemed to have slipped from the government’s list of urgent matters.
“Over ten million elders cling to the hope that a bolstered allowance could ease their golden years,” declared Chuayphrik, embodying the woes and wants of an entire generation.
Somwang Damno—a sage formerly in the role of village patriarch, now graced with the wisdom of years—shared his reality: subsisting on a paltry 700 baht from the state’s coffers. He mused that with a monthly endowment of 3,000 baht, an elder could float through the moon’s cycle without the gnawing worry of penniless days.
Watthana Lamsa chimed in with mixed sentiments; a supporter of increased dole for seniors, yes, but a staunch critic of indebting the nation to do so. His stance wove complexity into the tapestry of debate—a testament to the multifaceted nature of governance and care for our elders.
This tale of strife and persistence is but a chapter in the ongoing narrative of a society grappling to balance compassion with fiscal prudence. At its heart is the fundamental question: How do we honor those who have built the foundations upon which we stand?
Be First to Comment