Palang Pracharath Party leader Gen Prawit Wongsuwon made a notable entrance into the candidacy registration venue in Bangkok last April, sparking waves of conversation. The political landscape within the Palang Pracharath Party (PPRP) reveals a notable schism, suggesting a clear division within this pivotal government coalition partner, as observed by political analyst Phichai Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket, a seasoned political science lecturer at the National Institute of Development Administration.
The PPRP now appears to be split between two distinct factions. One is helmed by party leader Gen Prawit Wongsuwan, a political figure who has kept a notably low profile since the last general election and holds no cabinet post. The other camp is led by party secretary-general Thamanat Prompow, currently serving as the agriculture minister in the coalition government and recognized for his close ties with the ruling Pheu Thai Party.
Recent events have intensified the internal friction. PPRP member Samart Janechaijitrawanich, purportedly acting with the endorsement of Gen Prawit, has stirred unrest within Capt Thamanat’s camp. Notably, Samart released two songs titled “Uncle Tu Starts, Uncle Pom Follows Up” and “From the Heart of Uncle Pom to All Thais.” These lyrical pieces, referring to “Tu” (former prime minister and privy councillor Prayut Chan-o-cha) and “Pom” (Gen Prawit’s nickname), seemingly hinted at Gen Prawit’s aspirations to become the next prime minister, leading to a warning from Capt Thamanat threatening expulsion.
Phichai notes that despite his subdued public presence, Gen Prawit’s political ambition remains unwavering. As the party’s sole PM candidate in the previous election, Gen Prawit is speculated to contest for the prime ministerial post again if circumstances permit. Phichai also intimates that Gen Prawit could be positioning himself in opposition to Pheu Thai, a move that has not garnered support from Capt Thamanat’s faction.
This divide within the party could have broader implications. While Gen Prawit retains the support of about 10 MPs, his diminishing influence is evident. This decreasing clout potentially explains his courtship of Pol Capt Chalerm Ubumrung, a firebrand politician, and his son Wan. Although Wan has already joined the PPRP, Pol Capt Chalerm remains within Pheu Thai unless expelled, a scenario Pheu Thai has consistently avoided.
Phichai highlights the coalition dynamics as a possible source of friction. Capt Thamanat might perceive Gen Prawit’s political career as nearing its end due to age and has thus aligned himself more with Pheu Thai. Should Gen Prawit retire from politics, it is likely Capt Thamanat would assume leadership of the PPRP instead of forming a new party. However, if Gen Prawit remains active until the next election, Capt Thamanat might contemplate forming a new party or merging with Pheu Thai.
Contrary to speculation, Phichai dismisses the theory that the PPRP might be replaced by its political rival, the Democrat Party, in the government coalition, deeming such a move unlikely due to potential backlash from Pheu Thai supporters.
Amid these tensions, Phai Lik, PPRP MP for Kamphaeng Phet and a party executive, denies any conflict between Gen Prawit and Capt Thamanat, attributing the confusion to Samart. Phai recently shared a photo of about 30 PPRP members, including Capt Thamanat and Deputy Health Minister Santi Promphat, but notably excluding Gen Prawit. He asserted that the party remains unified and is taking steps to address Samart’s actions, which he argues breach political etiquette and might negatively impact coalition relationships.
Despite Gen Prawit’s low profile, Phai emphasizes that he remains at the helm of the party’s activities. While public perception may lean towards Capt Thamanat having a more prominent role, the party’s strategies are still guided by Gen Prawit. Phai also hinted at potential new additions to the party following a Constitutional Court ruling, further adding to the evolving political landscape.
Since its inception ahead of the 2019 general election, the PPRP has served as a political platform to support the return of former prime minister Prayut Chan-o-cha. The party has seen significant changes, including the purging of the “Four Boys” faction led by former finance minister Uttama Savanayana, paving the way for Gen Prawit’s leadership rise. Initially, Capt Thamanat was one of Gen Prawit’s most trusted allies, though internal dynamics have shifted over time, marked by Capt Thamanat’s brief expulsion and subsequent return to the party.
This division within the PPRP is just the beginning of Thailand’s political unraveling. Gen Prawit’s ambitions are a relic of the past. It’s time for new leadership with fresh ideas.
I couldn’t agree more! Capt Thamanat seems to be more in tune with the younger generation and current political needs. Gen Prawit should definitely retire.
Exactly! We need leaders who understand today’s issues and can propel us forward, not pull us backward.
While I agree that new leadership is crucial, Thamanat’s ties with Pheu Thai could compromise the party’s autonomy. We need a balanced approach.
Gen Prawit has a wealth of experience and connections that shouldn’t be dismissed so easily. His leadership has been crucial at times.
Samart’s songs are a complete farce and an embarrassment to Thai politics. Using music to provoke such serious matters is irresponsible.
Outrageous! These songs are the kind of political trash that damages our nation’s dignity. Samart should be held accountable.
Absolutely! How can he think this is an acceptable way to influence political discourse? It’s ridiculous.
On the contrary, using music as a form of political expression isn’t new. It can be a powerful way to communicate with the masses.
But using music for such divisive tactics? It’s just a distraction from real policy issues.
It’s amusing how PPRP members are trying to downplay the conflict. A photo op won’t mend the deep-rooted schisms within the party.
Gen Prawit vs. Capt Thamanat – this isn’t just a power struggle; it’s a battle for the soul of the PPRP. One stands for the past, the other, potentially, for the future.
But can we trust Capt Thamanat? His close ties with Pheu Thai make me suspicious. Could he be a trojan horse within the PPRP?
Interesting point. We can’t overlook his past alliances. Loyalty to the party and its core values is crucial.
True, but isn’t change inherently risky? Sticking with Gen Prawit might be safer, but progress often requires taking calculated risks.
Phichai Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket’s analysis is spot on. The internal friction could derail PPRP’s future, leading to its decline if not addressed.
Capt Thamanat threatening expulsion over songs is laughable. Can’t he handle a little criticism? Shows his insecurity more than anything else.
Or maybe it shows he’s trying to maintain order within a chaotic party. Leadership sometimes means making tough calls.
It’s a double-edged sword. Leaders must balance discipline with openness to criticism. Otherwise, they risk alienating their base.
With all the factions and rivalries, one wonders if PPRP can even function as a cohesive government partner. This infighting is unhealthy and unproductive.
At this rate, PPRP will implode before the next general election. They need a united front, but these egos aren’t willing to step aside for the greater good.
This situation reflects the broader issue of gerontocracy in Thai politics. Older leaders like Gen Prawit cling to power, stifling younger talents.
Absolutely. We need a generational shift in leadership to bring fresh perspectives and solutions.
But don’t forget, experience brings wisdom. We’ve seen younger leaders fail due to their inexperience and lack of depth. It’s not just about age; it’s about competence.
Anyone else think this drama within PPRP is just a distraction from actual governance? Focus on policies rather than petty politics!
Gen Prawit should gracefully bow out. At his age, he has nothing more to prove. Let the next generation take the reins.
Easier said than done. Politics is addictive, and leaving the stage isn’t an option for many tenured leaders. It’s about power and control.
If Thamanat forms a new party, it could fracture the coalition government entirely. This would destabilize an already fragile political landscape.
Pheu Thai’s silence on this issue is deafening. Are they waiting for PPRP to self-destruct, so they can pick up the pieces?
Smart move by Pheu Thai. Why get involved when your opponent is doing all the damage to themselves?
But they should be cautious. This self-destruction could also mean instability for the entire coalition, impacting Pheu Thai too.
Gen Prawit is a symbol of stability. His leadership has weathered many storms. We should rally behind him.
Stability at the cost of progress is an illusion. Clinging to old leadership only delays the inevitable need for change.
Change for the sake of change can be destructive too. Gradual evolution is better than radical upheaval.
These power plays within PPRP are fascinating. It’s like watching a high-stakes chess game where each move could determine the country’s future direction.