Press "Enter" to skip to content

New DUI Regulations 2024: Police Gain Authority to Perform Blood and Urine Tests in Thailand

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

In a move set to radically shift how authorities handle suspected cases of drunk driving, police now have the power to take urine or blood samples from drivers who refuse to blow into breathalyzer devices, thanks to a new regulation. This announcement was published in the Royal Gazette last Friday, supplanting the older regulations from 1994 and 2017 that relied heavily on breathalyzers as the primary means of testing for intoxicated drivers.

The updated regulation aims to better align the alcohol testing procedures with modern-day scenarios while enhancing the effectiveness of legal measures designed to curb drunk driving. However, the real impact of this change, including how many additional offenders will be ensnared, remains to be seen.

Under this new rule, if a driver refuses a breathalyzer test, police are now authorized to collect urine samples or escort the driver to a hospital for a blood test. For urine collection, officers are instructed to first obtain the driver’s consent. They’ll provide a secure area for the driver to urinate into a sealable container, managing the space diligently to prevent any tampering with the samples.

These urine samples are then sent to a nearby hospital for laboratory analysis. Conversely, for blood tests, officers are required to take the driver to a medical facility where qualified personnel will perform the test. The law stipulates that drivers with more than 50 milligrams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood, or 20 milligrams for those under 20 years old, are deemed intoxicated and will face charges of drunk driving.

In an intriguing twist, the law also assumes that drivers who refuse a medical examination without a valid reason have a blood alcohol level exceeding the legal threshold. The doctor administering the test must document the refusal and inform the police, initiating an investigation into the case.

Earlier this year, on January 30, the previous government approved an amendment to the Land Transportation Act allowing alcohol level tests on drivers within three hours of being stopped by the police. At the time, Karom Polpornklang, who served as the deputy spokesperson for the government, stated that the amendment was intended to broaden the methods available to identify drunk drivers beyond the sole use of breathalyzers.

This regulatory shift underscores a significant step forward in the battle against impaired driving, aiming to close loopholes and adopt a more comprehensive approach to ensure road safety. While it’s too soon to predict the new regulation’s overall efficacy, one thing is certain: it’s shaking up the status quo and sending a clear message to those attempting to dodge alcohol tests.

36 Comments

  1. Joe September 21, 2024

    This is too invasive. I get trying to stop drunk driving, but making people give blood or pee is a violation of privacy.

    • Susan Thompson September 22, 2024

      Joe, it’s a necessary measure. Drunk drivers kill people. If someone refuses a breathalyzer, they’re probably guilty anyway.

      • Joe September 22, 2024

        I understand the risks, Susan, but where does it stop? Next, they’ll be drawing blood on the roadside!

      • AnotherUser98 September 22, 2024

        Agreed, Joe. What’s next? Tracking our movements 24/7?

    • Ravi September 22, 2024

      Susan is right. If you’re not doing anything wrong, you shouldn’t be worried about taking a test.

  2. Linda Smith September 22, 2024

    This new law will save lives. Those who drink and drive should face the harshest penalties.

  3. John Doe September 22, 2024

    But what about false positives? Urine samples can be tampered with, and blood tests can be inaccurate.

  4. Lisa M September 22, 2024

    John, they have strict procedures to prevent false positives. The measures are there to ensure people’s safety.

    • John Doe September 22, 2024

      Lisa, no system is foolproof. There’s always a margin for error. Innocent people can suffer from these errors.

    • Michael September 22, 2024

      Exactly, John. Plus, who supervises the supervisors? More power to police can lead to abuse.

  5. Anna September 22, 2024

    It’s a sad day when we give up our personal freedoms for the illusion of safety.

  6. Carlos September 22, 2024

    Anna, it’s not an illusion. Preventing drunk driving through stricter laws can really save lives.

  7. Jake T September 22, 2024

    I’m all for it. If you don’t want to be subjected to these tests, don’t drink and drive!

    • Anna September 22, 2024

      Jake, you’re oversimplifying the issue. What if someone is falsely accused?

    • Jake T September 22, 2024

      False accusations are unfortunate, but rare. The number of lives saved will outweigh those few cases.

  8. Kathy September 22, 2024

    What about people with fear of needles? Is there a provision for them?

    • David M September 22, 2024

      Kathy, there should be. Not everyone can easily give blood. Maybe another non-intrusive testing method can be an option.

  9. Gary1976 September 22, 2024

    Big brother is watching us. This is just another way for the government to control us.

  10. Lori P September 22, 2024

    Gary, sometimes we need strict rules to keep society safe. It’s a small price to pay for less drunk driving accidents.

  11. Karen September 22, 2024

    What if somebody has a medical condition that affects the test results? These laws don’t account for every possible scenario.

  12. Siya September 22, 2024

    Karen, the benefits here far outweigh the potential downsides. Medical conditions affecting results should be the exception, not the rule.

    • Karen September 22, 2024

      But the law should be comprehensive. Overlooking even a few exceptions can be harmful.

  13. Tim September 22, 2024

    This is just another way to increase government revenue through fines and legal fees.

  14. Cindy N September 22, 2024

    Tim, this is more about saving lives than making money. Drunk driving is a serious issue.

    • Tim September 22, 2024

      Cindy, I get that, but governments often have ulterior motives. It’s naive to think it’s only about safety.

  15. Luke S September 22, 2024

    If these new measures help to bring down the rate of road accidents, I think they are completely justified.

  16. Emily R September 22, 2024

    The law assumes guilt if someone refuses a test, which seems unfair. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

  17. RyanD September 22, 2024

    Emily, refusing a test is suspicious on its own. If you have nothing to hide, why not comply?

  18. Sophia September 22, 2024

    These new regulations are absolutely necessary. Too many lives are lost due to drunk drivers.

    • Tina September 22, 2024

      Sophia, you’re right. If people just follow the laws, they won’t have anything to worry about.

  19. Ali September 22, 2024

    This is a step towards a safer society. Drunk driving is a scourge that needs to be eradicated.

    • Marc September 22, 2024

      Ali, it’s a delicate balance. We need safety but not at the cost of personal freedoms.

  20. Emma L September 22, 2024

    Does anyone know if there are similar laws in other countries? Are they effective?

  21. Dean September 22, 2024

    Emma, many countries have severe drunk driving laws. They have proven to be effective in reducing accidents.

  22. Ramesh September 22, 2024

    The real challenge will be in the implementation. How will they ensure fairness and prevent misuse?

  23. Priya Patel September 22, 2024

    Ramesh, it will depend a lot on the training and integrity of the officers. It’s crucial to have checks and balances.

  24. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »