Pheu Thai secretary-general Sorawong Thienthong, the charismatic figure of the party, was spotted handing an invitation to Democrat secretary-general Det-it Khaothong at the Parliament in Bangkok on August 28th. The photo, which has been making rounds across social media, captured a moment that has since sparked fervent discussions and debates. But what do the people think about such a pivotal political alliance?
The heartlands of the Democrats, especially the South, didn’t take the news lightly. According to an illuminating survey conducted by the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), the decision taken by the Democrats to join the Pheu Thai-led government has stirred quite the controversy. The survey was conducted over September 2nd and 3rd, with NIDA polling 1,310 individuals aged 18 and above, cutting across various educational levels, occupations, and incomes. The voices from 14 southern provinces were compiled to understand the sentiments towards the Democrats’ surprising move.
Let’s delve deeper into the findings. When asked about the Democrats’ decision to form a coalition government with their long-standing rivals, Pheu Thai, the responses were a mixed bag:
- Interestingly, a significant 54.19% of respondents were adamantly against the idea, vehemently expressing their disapproval.
- Another 14.58% were moderately disagreeable, perhaps hinting at a cautious skepticism rather than outright rejection.
- In contrast, 12.98% of the people found this decision to be agreeable, sounding their support loud and clear.
- Add to this group, 11.91% who moderately agreed, signaling a tentative but hopeful acceptance.
- And finally, 6.34% of respondents either didn’t have an opinion or didn’t care enough to form one.
This has certainly put a question mark on the Democrats’ future. When these southern voices were asked whether they would stand by the Democrat Party in the next election, the responses revealed deep fractures:
- 41.37% openly declared that they would abandon the Democrats at the ballot box.
- A nearly identical 41.15% remained indecisive, reflecting a state of political flux.
- Only 17.48% pledged their unwavering support for the country’s oldest political entity.
What does all this mean for the Democrats? The statistics tell a tale of waning support and rising uncertainty. It’s critical for the Democrats to navigate through these turbulent political waters with grace and strategy if they wish to regain the trust of their traditional voter base.
Whether the alliance with Pheu Thai will prove to be a masterstroke or a misstep remains to be seen. As Thailand barrels towards its next election, the political landscape is poised for shifting allegiances and unexpected twists. One thing’s for sure – there’s never a dull moment in the political theatre of Thailand.
I don’t understand how the Democrats could betray their base like this! They’ve always been at odds with Pheu Thai.
It’s called politics. Alliances can shift when it comes to power and survival.
But at what cost? This move will destroy the trust that took decades to build.
My grandma always said, ‘There are no permanent friends, only permanent interests.’ Maybe that’s what the Democrats are thinking.
I agree, Jamie! This is like the Yankees teaming up with the Red Sox. What’s next? Cats and dogs living together?
I’m surprised that so many people are undecided. Are they waiting to see if the coalition actually works?
Probably, sometimes it’s better to wait and see rather than react impulsively.
These survey numbers are alarming for the Democrats. They need to fix this quickly if they want any chance in the next election.
Honestly, who cares? Politics is a game. Just sit back and enjoy the show.
That’s exactly the kind of apathy that’s ruining our country!
Well, Sunny has a point. It’s like a soap opera. Just with more consequences.
But these ‘consequences’ affect real lives. It’s not a laughing matter.
Sorry, Cindy. I didn’t mean to downplay the seriousness. Just frustrated with the circus it often becomes.
Hypocrites! That’s what the Democrats are proving to be. Doubling back on their promises.
I actually respect the Democrats for trying something new. The old strategies weren’t working.
Pheu Thai isn’t that bad. Maybe this coalition could bring some positive changes.
I think it’s too early to judge. Let’s see how they handle this coalition before making up our minds.
True, but how many more chances will the public give them? The clock’s ticking.
The South’s response is no surprise. They’ve felt neglected for years.
Absolutely, Tina. It’s almost like the Democrats have taken their loyalty for granted.
Why are people surprised? Coalitions aren’t new. It’s the only way to get things done with divided support.
The indecisiveness is a clear sign that voters are starting to question the fundamentals. Change is inevitable.
So we’re just supposed to accept this betrayal? I don’t think so!
Derek, betrayal is a strong word. Political alignments shift all the time.
Well, Frances, it feels like a betrayal to me. Trust isn’t easily rebuilt.
I just can’t wrap my head around it. The numbers show people don’t want this. Why force it?
It’s all about the long game, Ken. Sometimes short-term pain for long-term gain.
I hope you’re right, Andrea. I really do.
What about the people who are moderately agreeable? Are they just cautiously optimistic or indifferent?
Coalitions like this are just a band-aid. They’re not going to fix the deeper issues.
Only time will tell if this is a mistake or a masterstroke. Either way, the ride’s going to be interesting.
What if this alliance actually enhances governance? Two heads are better than one, right?