Press "Enter" to skip to content

Thailand’s Court Rules on Charter Amendment: The Ongoing Battle for Constitutional Reform

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Picture this: under the gleaming spotlight at Democracy Monument, an intriguing sight catches the eye — a replica of the charter, elegantly presented in an accordion-style parchment, resting on a golden tray. This symbolizes the grandeur and gravity of constitutional monarchy, serving as a stark reminder of the country’s dedication to democracy.

However, in a recent turn of events, the pulsating heart of Thailand’s democracy faced a significant moment. The Constitutional Court, in a session that was bound to leave a mark, addressed a pressing question from parliament. The air was thick with anticipation as the court deliberated on whether the constitution could undergo amendments before a referendum and the intricacies involved in the charter amendment process — including the burning question of how many referendums are deemed necessary.

With unanimous agreement, all seven judges on the bench decided to reject the petition. Their rationale was crisp and clear: the matter at hand was something they had already passed judgment on, and it fell outside parliament’s power runway. They underscored that the path to placing a proposed charter amendment motion on parliament’s agenda was already paved, aligned perfectly with meeting regulations.

Previously, the court had drawn a line in the sand, positing that a charter rewrite was off the table unless a referendum cleared the path. Specifically, amending critical areas of the charter or overhauling it entirely necessitated a prior thumbs-up from the public via a referendum. However, the verdict left a cloud of mystery around the number of referendums required, sparking discussions and debates across the nation.

In the aftermath of the court’s landmark ruling, Parit Wacharasindhu, a dynamic voice from the Move Forward Party (MFP) and a list MP, didn’t hold back. He passionately called upon the parliament president, Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, to spotlight charter amendment bills proposed by the robust forces of Pheu Thai and MFP on parliament’s agenda. Parit’s fiery address didn’t end there. He boldly critiqued the coup-appointed senators, nearing the twilight of their tenure, urging them not to cast shadows over the charter amendment’s journey.

The MFP’s stance, allied with Pheu Thai’s courage, has been unwavering in their commitment to hosting not one, but two referendums on the charter amendment, insisting on the democratic principle that members of a charter drafting assembly must be elected by the people, for the people. The mission to reengineer the military-sponsored 2017 constitution, a gemstone in the ruling party’s crown of election pledges, has swiftly climbed the ranks to become a priority issue for the coalition government.

The stage is set for an epic saga as the referendum topic, thanks to a pivotal 2021 Constitutional Court ruling, tiptoes through a minefield of public opinion and legal scrutiny. This ruling delineates that any ambition to revamp the entire charter must first win the heart of the public. Should the initial hurdle be cleared, another referendum awaits to seal the fate of the proposed content. In a strategic move, the government has convened a committee to sketch out the blueprint for hosting a referendum, embarking on a quest to stitch a consensus on the amendment of the 2017 constitution.

In essence, the unfolding narrative of Thailand’s constitutional saga is a rollercoaster of ambition, legal finesses, and democratic zeal. Stay tuned as we follow the twists and turns of this epic journey towards reshaping the nation’s foundational document. Will the beacon of democracy shine brighter, or will the shadows of past regulations dim its glow? Only time will tell.


  1. ChaiPattana April 17, 2024

    This court ruling is another testament to the judiciary’s stranglehold on the democratic process in Thailand. How many more obstacles must the people face for true constitutional reform?

    • SiamSunrise April 17, 2024

      I think you’re missing the point. The judiciary is there to ensure that the process is lawful and respects the existing constitution. It’s about maintaining order, not hindering democracy.

      • ChaiPattana April 17, 2024

        Maintaining order by whose standards? The same standards that have kept the military and elite in power for decades? It’s time for the constitution to reflect the people’s will, not the other way around.

      • NokNoi April 17, 2024

        Agreed with SiamSunrise, without law and order, we risk descending into chaos. There’s a reason why processes are in place.

    • IsaanDude April 17, 2024

      ChaiPattana has a point, though. When does ‘maintaining order’ become suppressing voices? The court seems to be using legal technicalities to block progress.

  2. BangkokBarry April 17, 2024

    Everyone’s focused on the court, but what about the senators? Their silence speaks volumes. They’re just waiting out their tenure with no real skin in the game.

    • ThaiTiger April 17, 2024

      Exactly! The appointed senators have no incentive to support change. They owe their positions to the status quo. It’s frustrating to witness.

  3. PaiMai April 17, 2024

    The plan for two referendums sounds like a step in the right direction. At least they’re trying to involve the public in the decision-making process. That’s democracy in action, isn’t it?

    • LannaHeart April 17, 2024

      In theory, yes. But remember how referendums are conducted here. Will the public be properly informed? Or will it just be a show to legitimize the outcome they already want?

      • PaiMai April 17, 2024

        Good point. The effectiveness of these referendums will ultimately depend on transparency and informed public participation. That’s something we should all fight for.

  4. Urbanite27 April 17, 2024

    Let’s not forget the proposed amendments themselves. What’s actually on the table? Are we getting lost in the process and forgetting to scrutinize the content?

    • Lek101 April 17, 2024

      You’re onto something. Everyone’s talking about how to amend the constitution, but the real question is: what changes are we pushing for? This needs a public discourse.

      • PolicyWonk April 17, 2024

        That’s the substance we should be debating. The focus on process is a distraction from evaluating whether the proposed amendments align with public interests.

    • Histophile April 17, 2024

      Amendment discussions often overlook historical context. Thailand’s political evolution is deeply intertwined with these legal nuances. Understanding the past is key to shaping our future.

  5. JasmineRice April 17, 2024

    Is anyone else worried this will just perpetuate the cycle of protests and crackdowns? It feels like every time we make some progress, we’re back to square one.

  6. Farang101 April 17, 2024

    Watching from abroad, it seems like Thailand is at a pivotal moment. The world is watching how it handles constitutional reform. This could set a precedent for other nations struggling with the same issues.

  7. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »