Amidst the lively hum of the bustling city, maintenance work is quietly underway at Tha Tian pier, set against the backdrop of Bangkok’s historic Phra Nakhon district—a quaint snapshot captured on November 26, brought to life by the lens of photographer Apichart Jinakul.
An Unsettled Minimum Wage Story Unfolds
As the sun rises over the Land of Smiles, a narrative of economics and social equity is stirring. A dedicated tripartite committee—a dynamic ensemble of worker, business and government affiliates—is gearing up for a pivotal assembly. The agenda? Revisiting a principal act that has seeded debates: the minimum daily wage decree issued on December 8. Yet, whispers of discontent rustle through the air as Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin’s words hang heavy—the proposed sums simply don’t measure up to the rigors of daily life.
The committee’s helmsman, Pairoj Chotikasathien, in his capacitated post as the secretary for labour, has declared Tuesday’s fortuitous revelations. Come Wednesday, the council will cogitate: Can the ink-dried resolution be refashioned for the greater good? The day will also witness deliberations over an intriguing formula—a scholarly concoction from Thammasat University’s Faculty of Economics, calculated to recalibrate wage adjustments.
Dissonance in the Committee
Yet, not all committee members harmonize with this proposed introspection. Enter Atthayut Leeyavanich, embodying the employers’ perspective, steadfastly dissenting against this wave of reconsideration. A fortress of constancy, he points to the unanimous decree sealed back in December—crafted within the legal confines, tried and true since ’98 by the Labour Protection Act. He calls for respect for the committee’s wisdom, a testament to a process that is thorough and just.
Meanwhile, Weerasuk Kaewboonpan, championing the employees’ voice, takes a more contemplative stance. He possesses a desire to broach the matter with his peers. Should they converge on the notion of change, the doors to discussions shall fling open; should they stand firm, so shall the resolve of the committee.
“Why not hold fast to our previous decree,” muses Mr. Weerasuk, “and let the economic tides of the following year guide our wage-crafting hand come next May?”
A Political Chess Move Suggested
In a parallel thread, Olarn Thinbangtieo, the sage political and legal scholar from Burapha University, posits a tactical maneuver for Prime Minister Srettha—a cabinet reconfiguration, no less—should the pledge of a 400 baht equilibrium remain unmet. This, a figure inked into the banners of the Pheu Thai Party, a promise echoing the drumbeat of their populist march.
The Prime Minister’s own dissatisfaction resonated through Kanchanaburi’s air on December 9, lamenting the committee’s ruling as a melody falling short of the crescendo needed in this symphony of livelihood. The pinch of the cost of living, he argued, played a disharmonious note with the subtle 2-16 baht wage uptick—a refrain especially dissonant in the southernmost provinces, where even an egg hatches a greater value.
Center Stage: The Cost of Living
Such is the tapestry of this unfolding economic saga, where the echoes of committee chambers meet the rhythmic pulse of the streets of Bangkok. Here, maintenance workers ply their trade upon Tha Tian pier, against a far-reaching tableau steeped in culture and history, even as searing discussions on sustenance, dignity, and livelihood ripple through the echelons of power.
With scholarly proposals and strategic political considerations at play, the stage is set for a decision that could reverberate through homes and marketplaces across the country. The people of Thailand await with bated breath, hoping for a wage narrative that harmonizes with the rhythm of their daily lives—each beat, each note, mattering more than ever.
Be First to Comment