Wissanu Krea-ngam, the prime minister’s legal adviser, hinted at a perhaps surprising possibility that former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra might contribute to the government, but just not in a political capacity, once he completes his jail term next month. Yes, you heard that right! Speaking candidly on Tuesday, Wissanu responded to reporters’ inquiries about Thaksin’s potential involvement post-release, scheduled for August 22.
“If the government seeks Thaksin’s assistance, he can certainly offer his expertise,” Wissanu noted. “The bottom line is, Thaksin can occupy any government position that isn’t constitutionally barred, such as a ministerial role. He’s still got plenty to offer in other capacities.”
Ah, but there’s a twist! While Thaksin can’t be a trade representative, he’s free to serve as an adviser to the prime minister or take on a special representative role, albeit temporarily. Those aren’t just hypothetical limits; they are very specific roles in the intriguing game of political chess.
Wissanu elaborated that Thaksin’s potential contributions to the Pheu Thai Party, led by his youngest daughter, Paetongtarn, are more than welcome. Can you picture it? The former PM offering insights into party operations as a regular member—like an executive aroma wafting through the chambers of a private company. Quite fittingly, his involvement wouldn’t be seen as overshadowing or dominating the party. However, whether or not he officially joins Pheu Thai remains to be seen.
When asked about Thaksin’s lese majeste charge, Wissanu brushed it off, saying, “It doesn’t really matter if he wants to involve himself with the party. Other members and some executives face their own legal issues, too.”
As for a leadership role in the future, the current constitution bars Thaksin from running for prime minister or seeking election again. “Of course, if a new constitution comes into play, then that could change the entire scenario,” Wissanu hinted, leaving a door slightly ajar.
For those of you keeping track at home, Thaksin returned to Thailand last August after a self-imposed exile of 15 years. On his return day, he was escorted to the Supreme Court, which levied an eight-year prison sentence across three cases. That hefty term was later reduced to just one year thanks to royal clemency.
On his initial night at Bangkok Remand Prison, the DOC doctors determined his medical condition required immediate attention, necessitating his transfer to the Police General Hospital. This medical drama played out over six months until Thaksin was finally paroled and discharged this past February.
Beaming with pride, Pheu Thai Party leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra shared that her father, currently under the Department of Probation’s supervision, possesses the experience, knowledge, and vision needed to contribute to both the party and the government. From a family legacy point of view, this makes for a compelling narrative of continuity and duty—almost like a political soap opera.
This is absolutely absurd! Thaksin shouldn’t have any role in the government after all that he’s done.
Why not? He’s paid his dues and has a wealth of experience. Maybe he could actually help.
Experience doesn’t erase corruption. The ethical implications of this are profound.
And how exactly can we trust someone like him to help without trying to manipulate the system again?
People need to understand the difference between paying a debt to society and regaining trust. Thaksin’s history is a huge red flag.
If Thaksin truly wants to help, he should steer clear of politics entirely. An advisory role, even, can be too influential.
Thaksin advising the Pheu Thai Party can bring about a positive change. Let’s give him a chance.
Positive change? Are you kidding me? He’ll probably just use his influence to advance his family’s political dynasty.
What’s wrong with that if the family’s political strategy is to benefit the people?
The issue is about transparency and accountability. Can Thaksin provide that given his past?
Thaksin’s advisory role could be invaluable given his previous experience and international connections.
Honestly, this looks like a political maneuver to keep him relevant in Thai politics.
Yeah, and how many of these moves are done for the people’s benefit, really?
Even if he doesn’t hold a position, his influence could be overshadowing. Not a good move.
Would his involvement actually change anything? The systemic issues in Thai politics are too entrenched.
Exactly. One man, even with experience, can’t change a system that’s fundamentally flawed.
I’m curious about Wissanu’s agenda here. Why bring this up now?
Timing is everything in politics, my friend. Maybe it’s a ploy to test public reaction.
Or to slowly reintegrate him into politics without causing a major uproar.
Legally, if he’s allowed to advise, there’s no issue. Let’s see the results before judging.
Pheu Thai Party needs to be careful; Thaksin’s advisory role could backfire and bring more bad press.
Bringing Thaksin back into the fold only shows how desperate the party is for leadership.
Desperate or pragmatic? Sometimes experienced hands are what’s needed.
It’s a tightrope walk, for sure. One misstep, and it could spell disaster for the party.
If not Thaksin, then who else is fit to guide the Pheu Thai Party?
Advising is fine, but with strict oversight. We can’t forget Thaksin’s past missteps.
His return should be seen in a broader context. Thailand’s politics need repair, and he could be a part of that.
Honestly, nothing good will come from Thaksin’s involvement. The man’s track record speaks for itself.
People can change, and desperate times call for different measures. Let’s be open-minded.
Wissanu’s hints are likely a calculated move to gauge public sentiment before taking real action.
Thailand has always had a complicated relationship with its leaders. Thaksin’s return is just another chapter.