The Transport Ministry has made a bold move to extend the 20-baht flat fare initiative on the Red and Purple electric railway lines beyond the original end date. Initially set to wrap up in November, the policy will now remain in place thanks to a notable 26% surge in passenger numbers.
Transport Minister Suriya Jungrungreangkit emphasized that his department has been tirelessly advocating for the continuation of this flat-rate system, primarily focusing on the State Railway of Thailand (SRT) Red Lines and the Metropolitan Rapid Transit’s (MRT) Purple Line. The scheme began as a pilot project, sanctioned by the cabinet, from Oct 16, 2023, to Nov 30, 2024. Its primary goal? Easing the financial burden on daily commuters.
“We’ve ensured that passengers on both lines will benefit from this policy uninterrupted,” Mr. Suriya confirmed, hinting that the extension might even stretch beyond the original Nov 30 cutoff. He noted that if the new cabinet’s green light is needed, the ministry will promptly put forth a proposal.
The numbers back up this decision. Citing data, Mr. Suriya shared that total ridership on the SRT Red Lines and the MRT Purple Line soared by 26.39%—from 21.3 million between Oct 16, 2022, and July 31, 2023, to an impressive 26.92 million between Oct 16, 2023, and July 31, 2024.
However, there was a catch. Both lines generated 432.48 million baht during the latter period, marking an 18.87% dip compared to the 533.04 million baht earned previously. Despite this, Mr. Suriya is resolute in rolling out the 20-baht flat fare across all electric railway lines within the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR) by next September.
To make this sweeping change, the ministry is currently drafting the Common Ticketing System Management Act, which will soon be presented to the new cabinet. The act aims to secure funds and streamline operations, removing the constraints imposed by existing concession contracts. “The transition to the new government has pushed our timeline back about a month,” Suriya explained.
The ministry also plans to bring in experts to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of reclaiming operational rights for electric railway systems from private entities. This comprehensive study will guide future decisions, ensuring a well-rounded approach to managing the capital’s public transportation.
While it’s clear that the Transport Ministry is betting big on this extended flat fare initiative, only time will tell how this strategy impacts the broader landscape of urban mobility in Bangkok. One thing’s for sure: commuters are in for a more affordable ride!
I think this flat fare is great for all commuters! It makes traveling around the city so much more affordable.
Yes, it’s good but have you thought about the impact on revenue for the railway companies? They might struggle financially.
That’s true, Miriam, but the government could subsidize the losses. The benefit to the public could outweigh the financial shortcomings.
The loss might be huge, though. They are seeing a drop in revenue already!
Sustainability is also a factor. If more people take the train instead of driving, isn’t that better for the environment?
The government extending this policy seems like a populist move. They’re just trying to win votes before the next election.
Maybe, but if it benefits the people, who cares if they gain some political capital along the way?
I agree, Michael. Policies should be economically sound, not just vote-winning tactics.
You guys are missing the bigger picture! Increased public transit use means fewer cars on the road, which means less pollution!
I agree with eco_Warrior! And don’t forget the traffic jams in Bangkok. If more people use the train, it might reduce congestion too.
This is a disaster waiting to happen. Once the gov can’t fund the subsidy anymore, prices will skyrocket to cover losses.
It is a risk, Dave. But if the flat fare brings in more ridership, the volume might balance the costs.
You forget the economic principle of supply and demand. Increased demand might actually allow for economies of scale!
Does anyone know if they are considering extending this to other cities in Thailand?
I don’t care about the economic arguments, it just means I get to save money when going to work.
Not everyone is so myopic, Larry. Think about the bigger implications for society.
I read somewhere that such initiatives have been successful in other countries. Maybe it will work here too.
This is just anecdotal evidence. Let’s see some hard stats after a year or two before celebrating.
People are always so negative. Can’t the government do something nice for once without everyone losing their minds?
It’s a good initiative, but it needs strict monitoring to ensure it doesn’t backfire financially.
Agreed, Fatima. Having experts to study the impact is a step in the right direction.
If the government’s efficient and sets up the Common Ticketing System, this might actually streamline costs.
I just hope they also improve the service quality. It’s not just about the fare; it’s also about the travel experience.
Can we trust the new government to implement this properly after the cabinet change?
Valid point. Transitional periods are always shaky for long-term policies.
The ministry pulling back operational rights from private entities might introduce more bureaucracy and inefficiency.
On the flip side, Henry, it might ensure that profit motives don’t compromise the quality of service.
I think integrating all lines under one fare system is smart. It removes the confusion and the hassle of multiple payments.
If they want this to work, they should also focus on increasing train capacity. Crowded trains are a nightmare.
Yes, vacant seats would encourage more people to switch from cars to trains.
Let’s not forget the employee aspects. Will staff salaries be affected by the decreased revenue?
I know I’m saving around 600 baht a month. This has really helped me manage my budget better.
Awesome, Matt! More money in the pockets of people is always a good thing.
Exactly my point, Donovan! Immediate benefits for the everyday commuter.