The first task for Wissanu Krea-ngam, newly appointed adviser to Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, is to delve into the intricate details of the PM’s defence in a contentious case regarding the appointment of the polarizing politician Pichit Chuenban as a PM’s Office minister. As Mr. Wissanu appeared at Tuesday’s cabinet meeting, he noted that his advisory role permitted his attendance.
This appearance marked Wissanu’s initial participation under the Srettha administration subsequent to assuming his new role. “There’s nothing particularly exciting about this; I have been around the Government House for over 30 years,” quipped Wissanu. He confirmed his assignment to scrutinize the specifics of the PM’s defence in this unfolding case.
The Council of State, acting as the government’s legal advisor, along with the secretariat of the cabinet, will furnish him with a draft of the defence for his review. This draft needs to be polished and submitted to the Constitutional Court by June 8, explained Wissanu, a seasoned legal expert.
When questioned about the likelihood of the PM winning the case, Mr. Wissanu remained non-committal. “I cannot predict a definite loss or victory. I need to see the defence details first,” he stated with measured caution.
Curiosity peaked as reporters pressed him on why he chose to undertake this challenging task despite his health issues. Wissanu confessed that he had pondered heavily over the decision. “I figured that aiding the PM for a brief period wouldn’t be detrimental to my health or the nation. After all, I’m merely an ordinary adviser,” he remarked.
He continued, “I believe my assistance is crucial in resolving the nation’s pressing issues and in helping the government clarify certain doubts. It’s a step down from being a deputy prime minister to an adviser, but I’m not here for fame or fortune,” Wissanu stressed.
Addressing speculations that his appointment was met with disapproval from some Pheu Thai MPs, especially since he had been a cabinet minister in the Prayut Chan-o-cha government, Wissanu remained unperturbed. “I’m not worried. If the opposition grows more intense, I’ll simply step down,” he said nonchalantly.
On May 23, the Constitutional Court entertained a petition lodged by 40 caretaker senators demanding Mr. Srettha’s removal over the appointment of Pichit, whose eligibility remains questionable. The judges instructed Mr. Srettha to respond within 15 days. Additionally, the 40 caretaker senators previously sought clarity from the court on whether both Srettha and Pichit should be ousted from their positions.
Wissanu’s role is just a political maneuver to shield Srettha! Let’s be real, there’s no way he can be unbiased.
Mike, Wissanu’s experience speaks for itself. He’s a seasoned expert, and his role is critical for navigating these complex legal issues.
Dr. Aria, seasoned or not, old dogs play the same old tricks! It’s about who you know, not what you know.
MikeButton, that’s a bit cynical. Give the man a chance, his track record is commendable.
Isn’t it concerning that Wissanu has health issues yet is taking on such a stressful role? Seems irresponsible.
Alex, some people are driven by duty. Wissanu obviously feels a strong sense of responsibility towards the nation.
I agree with Alex. If he’s not in peak health, he might not be able to perform his duties effectively.
Srettha should’ve never appointed Pichit in the first place. This whole case is a mess!
Bo, hindsight is 20/20. Let’s see how the court rules first before jumping to conclusions.
WatcherJoe, sure, but it doesn’t take a genius to see Pichit was a risky pick from the get-go!
Why are they dragging Wissanu back into politics? They should let the man retire in peace.
Sophie, perhaps he sees this as unfinished business. True patriots don’t retire from serving their nation.
DeepThinker, or maybe it’s the power he can’t let go of. Just saying.
Wissanu’s presence is reassuring. His legal prowess could be the key to untangling this crisis.
What’s the big deal? Aren’t there more pressing issues in the country than Pichit’s appointment?
Timmy, the legality of appointments affects trust in the government. It’s crucial for maintaining democratic integrity.
Mary T., still, it feels like a distraction from bigger issues like the economy.
If the opposition grows more intense, Wissanu will step down? Seems like a cop-out to me.
I respect Wissanu’s dedication. Taking on such a case despite health issues shows his commitment.
What are the odds this is all just for show? Political theater at its finest.
CuriousCat, it’s possible, but don’t underestimate the legal complexities at play here.
AcademicAmy, true, but politics is often more about optics than substance.
Wissanu’s role could distract him from more pertinent economic issues that the country faces.
It’s refreshing to see a veteran like Wissanu taking an advisory role. His experience is invaluable.
Why even bother? Srettha’s government is doomed regardless of the outcome of this case.
PessimistPete, that’s too grim. Let’s have some faith in the process.
OptimismOlivia, I’d love to, but look at the state of our politics. It’s a disaster.
Wissanu has seen worse political crises. His perspective could add valuable insight into resolving this matter.
If Srettha and Pichit are both ousted, what’s next? The country’s leadership is already shaky.
Whether Wissanu succeeds or not, his efforts highlight the legal intricacies of government operations.
Wissanu strikes me as a dedicated individual. I hope his health holds up during this ordeal.
Why can’t we use AI to solve these legal issues? What’s the point of human advisors anyway?
TechGeek, AI isn’t capable of understanding nuanced human politics. We need experienced advisors like Wissanu.
Samantha, maybe, but AI could surely cut through some of the bureaucratic red tape faster than humans.
TechGeek, it’s not all about speed. Wisdom and human judgment still play crucial roles.
At the end of the day, this is just another episode in Thailand’s long-running political drama.