Press "Enter" to skip to content

Chiang Mai’s Fang Oilfield: A 300 Million Baht Transformation to Euro 5 Standards

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

The historic Fang oilfield in Chiang Mai, Thailand, renowned as the oldest in the nation, is poised for a major redevelopment, injecting fresh vigor into its operations with a substantial investment of 300 million baht. This ambitious venture, steered by the Northern Petroleum Development Centre (NPDC) under the Defence Energy Department, aims to elevate the oilfield’s production standards to new heights.

Anticipation builds around the slated upgrades to the oil refinery, which promise a transformation to Euro 5 standards. This leap will enable the refinery to produce low-sulphur diesel, a significant improvement that ensures the refined oil will be car engine-friendly. Maj Gen Montri Jeennakorn, the NPDC’s director, extolled the benefits of this upgrade, highlighting the refinery’s potential to minimize engine wear and environmental harm.

Currently, the Fang oilfield’s output capacity stands at a modest 600 barrels per day, predominantly of high-sulphur diesel and fuel oil. This limited production volume has deterred private sector investment, as it’s deemed insufficient to lure commercial interest. Accelerating the extraction process might seem like a feasible solution to boost output, but it comes with the caveat of hastening the depletion of the crude oil reserves.

Nevertheless, Maj Gen Montri Jeennakorn assured stakeholders that, with judicious management, the oilfield’s lifespan could be extended by another half-century. He elaborated, “The oil we produce holds strategic importance for the military, especially during times of conflict when external supply lines might be compromised. Ensuring a reliable, legal source of oil is critical.”

This strategic value has not gone unnoticed by political factions. The Move Forward Party recently urged the army to hand over control of the oilfield to the government, arguing that oil production falls outside the military’s remit. Echoing this sentiment, the Ministry of Defence expressed its willingness to transfer the management of the oilfield, contingent upon assurance that future operations would be conducted with efficiency and accountability.

The impending redevelopment is more than just an economic undertaking; it’s a venture filled with the promise of technological advancement and national security. As the Fang oilfield gears up for a renaissance, stakeholders remain cautiously optimistic, setting their sights on a future where the blend of strategic foresight and cutting-edge technology secures both Thailand’s energy needs and environmental commitments.


  1. Sarah Chen July 10, 2024

    I can’t believe they are investing so heavily in an outdated oilfield. Shouldn’t we be focusing on renewable energy sources by now?

    • Chang99 July 10, 2024

      Renewable energy is great and all, but we’re not ready to give up on oil just yet. This upgrade is necessary for national security.

      • Tanya Walters July 10, 2024

        National security or not, it’s 2023! The environmental impacts of oil production can’t be ignored any longer.

      • Sarah Chen July 10, 2024

        Exactly! We need to think long-term, and renewable energy is the future. This investment feels like a step backward.

    • AJ45 July 10, 2024

      Isn’t it better to make the existing infrastructure more environmentally friendly while we transition to renewables? Euro 5 standards are a huge improvement!

      • Sarah Chen July 10, 2024

        Maybe, but 300 million baht could do a lot more good if invested in solar or wind projects right now.

  2. John M. July 10, 2024

    The military’s involvement in oil production is problematic. Why not let the government or private sector handle it?

    • Lisa P. July 10, 2024

      Probably because they want to ensure a steady supply during conflicts. That makes sense to me.

      • John M. July 10, 2024

        Sure, but the military should focus on defense, not oil production. It just seems like a conflict of interest.

      • DefenseAnalyst July 10, 2024

        In times of war, having control over oil ensures operational integrity. It’s a strategic necessity.

        • John M. July 10, 2024

          Still, there’s a balance to be struck. Civilian control could ensure better efficiency and transparency.

  3. EcoWarrior July 10, 2024

    This is such a misuse of funds! We need to completely halt fossil fuel extraction.

    • Sue B. July 10, 2024

      It’s not that simple. The world still relies on oil. This upgrade is a step toward cleaner energy, even if it’s still oil.

  4. SonnyD July 10, 2024

    I’m glad they’re upgrading to Euro 5 standards. Cleaner diesel is a necessity for reducing emissions.

    • Jerry O. July 10, 2024

      Totally agree! Even if we move toward renewables, we need cleaner fuels in the interim.

      • Anna K. July 10, 2024

        Cleaner but still harmful. We can’t forget about the long-term environmental impact.

  5. TheRealFrank July 10, 2024

    Private sector wouldn’t touch it because of low output. Upgrading to Euro 5 might bring commercial interest which is good for the economy.

    • Patricia L. July 10, 2024

      Sure, but the focus should still be on sustainable jobs. Oil isn’t the future.

      • TheRealFrank July 10, 2024

        Sustainability and economy need to go hand in hand. This upgrade could be a bridge to more tech in the future.

  6. Sarah Chen July 10, 2024

    I’ll re-emphasize that an investment of this magnitude in outdated technology is short-sighted. Future generations need us to act now!

    • Mitch J. July 10, 2024

      But in the short term, we need a reliable energy source. This project gives us more time to develop renewable infrastructure.

  7. Willie G. July 10, 2024

    What’s Euro 5 standards anyway? Why does it matter?

    • TechieTom July 10, 2024

      Euro 5 standards mean low-sulphur diesel, which is better for car engines and the environment. It’s a significant upgrade!

  8. Thad Wilson July 10, 2024

    Why hasn’t the government taken control of this project already? The military’s track record isn’t exactly stellar when it comes to efficiency.

    • Larry D. July 10, 2024

      They likely want to ensure no disruption during critical times. Military efficiency, though sometimes secretive, is usually dependable.

  9. Paul S July 10, 2024

    300 million baht could be better spent on improving infrastructure elsewhere, like public transportation which is greener anyway.

  10. GamerDude77 July 10, 2024

    Why not just ramp up the production? At 600 barrels a day, it’s negligible anyway.

    • Engineer23 July 10, 2024

      Accelerating extraction would deplete reserves faster. It’s about balance.

  11. EnergyBuff July 10, 2024

    The strategic value in securing an internal oil source during conflicts cannot be overstated. This project has merit.

    • PeaceLover July 10, 2024

      Strategic value or just another excuse to extend dependency on fossil fuels?

      • EnergyBuff July 10, 2024

        Both can be true. We need a secure supply while transitioning to other sources.

  12. Emika July 10, 2024

    I live near Fang, and we really need jobs! This investment could help the local economy.

  13. Jessica M. July 10, 2024

    The Move Forward Party’s push for government control makes sense, given the potential for corruption in military-managed projects.

    • Col. Smith July 10, 2024

      The military has managed this oilfield for decades without major issues. Change could introduce unforeseen problems.

  14. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »