Under a blaze of lights and a swirl of controversy, Fátima Bosch of Mexico was crowned Miss Universe 2025 tonight in Nonthaburi, Thailand, delivering a coronation that felt more like the final scene of a blockbuster than a beauty pageant. The 25-year-old from Santiago de Teapa, Tabasco — who studied Fashion and Apparel Design at Universidad Iberoamericana and sharpened her craft in Milan and Vermont — outshone 119 contestants to claim the coveted crown at Impact Challenger Hall.
A red gown, a flowing cape, and a very big moment
Walking to center stage in a striking red cheongsam–inspired gown with a dramatic flowing cape, Bosch combined classic elegance with stage-ready drama. When last year’s winner, Victoria Kjær Theilvig, placed the crown on her head, the room erupted — and so did the headlines. Bosch becomes the fourth Mexican to take the Miss Universe title, joining the ranks of Andrea Meza, who was notably part of this year’s judging panel.
More than a crown: advocacy, honesty, and a personal platform
Beyond the sequins and spotlights, Bosch has been using her time in the competition to speak plainly about neurodiversity. Candid about her own struggles with dyslexia and ADHD, she transformed personal challenges into a public platform — promising in the Top 5 interview to use her voice “to serve others and promote positive change.” Her answer resonated in a year when audiences are looking for champions who bring substance alongside style.
Top placements and the standout contenders
While Bosch took the crown, the evening also spotlighted several memorable contestants. Thailand’s Praveenar Singh finished as first runner-up, bringing home a proud showing for the host nation. Venezuela’s Stephany Abasali earned second runner-up, and the Philippines’ Ahtisa Manalo and Côte d’Ivoire’s Olivia Yace rounded out a diverse and competitive Top 5. The mix of countries in the final spotlight reinforced Miss Universe 2025 as an international stage for talent, poise, and stories.
Controversy that shadowed the stage
If the night had a subplot, it was the weeks of drama that preceded the coronation. Just days before the final, two judges — Omar Harfouch and former footballer Claude Makelele — resigned; Harfouch cited “irregularities” while Makelele called it “unforeseen personal reasons.” The judging shakeup only added fuel to an already tense atmosphere.
The most publicized clash involved Bosch and Thai host country director Nawat Itsaragrisil during a pre-pageant livestreamed event. The exchange, which reportedly included Nawat calling Bosch “dumb” and security escorting her out after an alleged missed promotional shoot, sparked immediate backlash. Several contestants staged a walkout in protest. Raúl Rocha Cantú, Mexican businessman and president of the Miss Universe Organization, condemned the incident as “humiliation and abuse” and pledged swift action. The dispute — live-streamed and widely discussed across social platforms — eclipsed usual pre-show gossip and put a spotlight on conduct behind the scenes.
Thailand’s turn on the global stage — and what’s next
Thailand hosted Miss Universe for the fourth time this year, transforming Bangkok and nearby Nonthaburi into a hub of glamour, debate, and cultural exchange. Despite the controversies, the event delivered on spectacle and emotion — a reminder of why pageants continue to captivate global audiences.
Fans already have their calendars marked: Puerto Rico will host the next Miss Universe competition in 2026, setting the stage for a new chapter in the pageant’s storied history.
Why this win matters
Fátima Bosch’s victory is more than another title in the Miss Universe archive. It’s recognition of a contestant who blended runway-ready style with a real-world cause, who turned an awkward and public confrontation into a conversation about respect and dignity. From her background in fashion to her honest advocacy for people with dyslexia and ADHD, Bosch now carries a platform that stretches beyond crowns and sashes — into classrooms, advocacy rooms, and the headlines.
Whether you watched for the drama, the gowns, or the speeches, Miss Universe 2025 delivered a night that will be discussed long after the confetti clears. For Mexico, it’s a celebrated return to the top. For Bosch, it’s a beginning: of global responsibilities, of shaping a message about neurodiversity, and of proving that in 2025, pageant winners can be as outspoken and multifaceted as the audiences who watch them.


















Stunning win for Mexico and powerful to hear Bosch speak about dyslexia and ADHD, but the pre-show humiliation story is disturbing and shouldn’t be brushed aside.
Totally agree, Ana Maria — the crown can’t erase what happened backstage, and the organization needs to be transparent about how they handle misconduct.
I think people are overreacting; pageants always have drama and PR hiccups, it doesn’t mean the win is illegitimate.
Tom, minimizing abuse as ‘PR hiccups’ harms contestants; transparency matters and victims deserve respect.
Why are we still celebrating beauty contests in 2025? This feels like a relic even if she talks about neurodiversity.
Because for many contestants it’s a platform for advocacy and career opportunities, not just a beauty parade.
Fair point, Marta, but platforms can come from many places. I worry about the message of judging people on looks first.
From a cultural diplomacy perspective, Thailand hosting and Mexico winning both carry soft-power implications; these pageants function as spectacles that project national narratives globally.
Interesting take. Do you think the judging resignations undermine that diplomatic aspect?
Yes, Ravi, abrupt judge departures and allegations of irregularities can erode legitimacy and complicate the event’s role as a curated national showcase.
Legitimacy matters to viewers, but social media outrage often fuels more attention, which organizers sometimes exploit.
As someone with dyslexia, seeing Bosch speak openly made me tear up. Representation like this actually helps kids feel seen.
Representation is crucial, but I also want to know what concrete advocacy plans she has beyond speeches.
Priya, even visibility can change public attitudes, and if she uses the platform for policy change that would be ideal.
That red cheongsam–inspired gown looked amazing on stage, but I keep wondering if borrowing cultural garments for dramatic effect crosses a line into appropriation.
Depends on intent and respect for the culture. If it’s a sincere cross-cultural homage, some viewers will still see it as appropriation.
I don’t mind fusion fashion, but designers and contestants should credit influences and avoid caricature.
Also consider the host country was Thailand, so maybe blending Asian elements was fitting, but context matters a lot.
Proud moment for Mexico, and four Mexican winners in recent memory shows a trend of strong national pageant programs.
It shows investment in grooming world-class contestants, but we should ask whether the system is fair and accessible to diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
True, accessibility is key; talent shouldn’t be limited to those who can afford training and travel.
Two judges resigning with vague reasons is a red flag. We deserve a full account of what happened before celebrating the crown.
The organization issued statements, but they felt defensive and vague. Transparency would calm people down.
Exactly. If the process is sound, show the proof; if not, fix it. Otherwise trust erodes fast.
Or it’s just messy internal politics blown up by social media. Either way, the contestants get caught in the crossfire.
Thailand hosting again was a huge logistical and cultural showcase, and despite the controversies, tourism and cultural exchange benefit from such events.
Congrats to Fátima! She handled herself well after that nasty incident.
Feels scripted: controversy, walkout, heartfelt speech, viral moment, crown. Pretty polished PR cycle.
Sure, events have production, but dismissing authentic suffering as ‘scripted’ is cynical.
Tom, I get that, but the media machine knows how to turn pain into momentum; healthy skepticism keeps organizers honest.
As an advocate for neurodiversity, I’m hopeful but cautious; high-profile attention can be fleeting unless tied to measurable initiatives.
She could partner with schools or nonprofits and push policy change; that would be meaningful and measurable.
Exactly, Nora. I’d like to see long-term commitments and funding announcements, not just talk.
Sometimes visibility leads to grassroots support that snowballs — but it needs infrastructure to sustain it.
The contestants walking out was powerful solidarity, and it shows peers can call out mistreatment where institutions fail.
Solidarity is important, but did the walkout actually change anything, or was it symbolic theater?
Symbols matter, Marta. Sometimes public acts force institutions to act where private complaints don’t.
Public pressure can force reforms, but it can also backfire and make organizers double down unless demands are clear.
Good point, Chen. Clear demands and follow-up are needed if solidarity is to become reform.
I enjoyed the spectacle but hope the Miss Universe Organization learns to handle internal disputes better so contestants aren’t humiliated.
Ravi, exactly — contestants shouldn’t be collateral damage in power plays, and leadership must be accountable.
Leadership should also provide mental health resources during high-stress events, it’s common sense.
People underestimate how much pageant success depends on long-term coaching, funding, and networks, not just raw talent.
That’s true and raises equity concerns — talent isn’t the only variable, resources are huge.
If we want diversity, organizations should fund outreach and training in underrepresented communities.
The host director calling her ‘dumb’ is unforgivable if true; language like that from an authority figure damages trust and dignity.
Agreed. Even if tensions ran high, public humiliation is never acceptable and mechanics of accountability should follow.
I hope consequences are real and not just PR statements, otherwise nothing changes.
I think the combination of fashion credibility and authentic advocacy made Bosch a compelling winner, regardless of backstage noise.
Yes, the fact she studied fashion and worked abroad adds depth; it’s not just performance, it’s professional achievement.
Exactly, her background lets her speak credibly about design and industry, which can open doors beyond pageantry.
Puerto Rico hosting next year will be interesting; I hope lessons from this year lead to better governance and contestant protections.
Social media turned the backstage spat into a global debate, showing how modern pageants are as much about narrative control as crowns.
Narrative control can be used for good or bad. Right now it feels like a double-edged sword that contestants must navigate carefully.
If organizers want credibility, they should publish independent reports on allegations and make processes public.
Independent audits would be a start, and maybe rotating panels to reduce conflicts of interest.
I wonder whether Andrea Meza being on the judging panel influenced perceptions of fairness; having previous winners judge is a tricky balance.
Former winners bring experience but also networks and biases; transparency about scoring would help.
As a casual viewer, I loved the dresses and the drama, but reading about the mistreatment makes me feel guilty for enjoying it.
Your conflicted feelings matter, Rafael; entertainment often hides ugly realities and audiences shape standards with their reactions.
The international mix in the Top 5 shows pageants still have global cultural relevance, even if formats evolve to meet modern values.
I hope Fátima uses her crown to push for tangible education support for neurodiverse kids, not just inspirational talks.
Maya, yes — scholarships, teacher training, and public awareness campaigns would make a real difference.
People attacking the host or the organization online without evidence is also a problem; investigations need facts, not mob conclusions.
Can we separate admiration for Bosch from outrage about the organizers? You can celebrate a winner while demanding better treatment.