Press "Enter" to skip to content

Hat Yai Mayor Narongporn Na Phatthalung Apologises After Fast-Moving 2025 Floods

Hat Yai’s mayor, Narongporn Na Phatthalung, has publicly apologised for the city’s response to the recent, fast-moving floods — a rare, candid admission that the scale and speed of the disaster simply outpaced official expectations. Speaking on the “Kammakorn Khao” programme on Friday, November 28, Mayor Narongporn called the incident a collective misjudgement and outlined the immediate recovery priorities: clean-up, road re-openings, and getting aid to every affected household.

What unfolded in Hat Yai and neighbouring Nammom was not the usual slow-rise flood many had prepared for. Officials say the area was hit by a “rain boom”: six hours of continuous, intense rainfall that dumped more than 300 millimetres of water across parts of the city — far faster and harder than previous events. The city’s original assessment had expected runoff from Sadao to reach Hat Yai, and believed it would arrive from the same direction as in past floods. That assumption left officials unready when heavy rain struck Khao Kho Hong instead — an area that historically had not fed floodwaters into the city — and the situation escalated rapidly.

“I apologise to all the people of Hat Yai for the misjudgement,” Narongporn said on air, stressing that the error involved multiple agencies, including the Royal Irrigation Department, the Meteorological Department, and the municipality itself. The recognition that a chain of decisions — rather than a single failure — contributed to the crisis is important, both morally and practically, as the region moves from emergency response to recovery and accountability.

One flashpoint after the flooding was the controversy over the city’s warning flags. Critics circulated footage showing a green flag still flying even as people reported rising waters. The mayor clarified the timeline: a green flag had been raised earlier when conditions appeared under control, and a red flag — the highest alert — was hoisted later with the approval of the provincial governor, following standard procedure. The message was that on-the-ground conditions changed faster than signals could be adjusted or noticed by everyone.

Mayor Narongporn described a gruelling night manning the response on the ground. He remained at the scene throughout, personally overseeing the evacuation of some 700 to 800 people — many elderly or carrying injuries — to makeshift shelters at Prince of Songkla University. Yet even as volunteers and officials scrambled to move people to safety, communication networks collapsed. Phone lines and internet services went down, making coordination nearly impossible. “I didn’t know who to communicate with because the phone lines were down, and there was no internet. Even the journalists who came had no internet access,” he said.

When infrastructure and communication fail during a disaster, the human toll is amplified. Boats — the lifeline for many trapped residents — were in desperately short supply. Narongporn recounted joining rescue operations in District 8 alongside social activist Gun Jompalang, but noted there were only five functioning boats available for thousands of residents. Several municipal boats had already been damaged, leaving rescue teams to stretch resources thin across neighbourhoods piled with water and debris.

Photographs circulating online showed swollen streets, flood debris across Mueang Songkhla and damage to key facilities, including Hat Yai Hospital. These images underscore the scale of the recovery challenge: clearing rubble, sanitising flooded areas, restoring roads and utilities, and delivering relief packages to households that may be cut off for days.

Mayor Narongporn’s message was blunt and humble. “We really can’t handle this alone. I sincerely apologise to all the people of Hat Yai,” he said, asking for assistance from provincial and national agencies as well as non-government organisations and volunteers. His plea underlines an uncomfortable truth: when rare weather events or “rain booms” put pressure on systems calibrated for past patterns, local governments need extra support to bridge the gap between expectation and reality.

As Hat Yai shifts from rescue to recovery, officials say the immediate priorities are clear: reopening blocked roads, removing flood debris, repairing damaged boats and municipal assets, and ensuring that aid reaches the elderly, injured and other vulnerable residents. There are also lessons to be drawn for future flood planning — particularly the need for improved real-time communication, more flexible evacuation plans that consider unexpected rain directions, and greater reserves of rescue equipment.

For now, residents and rescuers face the gritty work of recovery. The mayor’s apology is a start — an acknowledgment of error that, if followed by concrete action and cooperation, could help the city rebuild stronger and better prepared. In southern Thailand’s unpredictable rainy season, Hat Yai’s experience is a reminder that weather patterns can surprise us, and that transparency, quick adaptation and collective support are essential when they do.

37 Comments

  1. Somsak November 30, 2025

    This apology sounds good, but words don’t fix flooded homes or broken boats. The mayor admits misjudgement, yet accountability must follow — who will pay for repairs and faster early-warning systems? If the Royal Irrigation Department and Meteorological Department failed, they should explain and face reform.

    • Lee November 30, 2025

      I agree, but public shaming won’t build infrastructure overnight. We need clear timelines and budgets, not only apologies.

    • Somsak November 30, 2025

      True, Lee, but timelines must start now — setting up temporary comms, buying more boats, and fixing phone line redundancy shouldn’t wait months. People are suffering this week.

    • grower134 November 30, 2025

      Or maybe this is just the usual government cover-up: blame a ‘rain boom’ and move on without prosecutions. Sounds convenient to me.

  2. Anna November 30, 2025

    I felt pity hearing the mayor describe evacuating elderly people at night, he seems sincere. That said, sincerity is not a substitute for preparedness and permanent solutions. The community should push for an independent review.

    • Dr. Elena Morales November 30, 2025

      Sincerity helps public trust, but as a hydrologist I stress the need for updated flood modeling and investment in sensors upstream. Climate extremes make old patterns unreliable.

    • Anna November 30, 2025

      Exactly — holding a review with independent experts could identify where models failed and what monitoring equipment is needed.

  3. grower134 November 30, 2025

    The green flag footage is suspicious; how is a green flag still flying while water is rising? Somebody is hiding something. We need CCTV logs and official timestamps. It smells like negligence.

    • Kitt November 30, 2025

      I was on the ground; flags are low-tech and people don’t always see them in time, especially when comms fail. Blaming flags alone ignores bigger failures in monitoring and rescue gear.

    • Mai November 30, 2025

      But if protocol says change flags with rising water, someone failed that simple duty. I’m furious that elders were misled.

    • grower134 November 30, 2025

      Protocol failures are not ‘simple duties’ when departments are understaffed and demoralized. Still, that doesn’t excuse leaving people unaware.

  4. Dr. Elena Morales November 30, 2025

    This was a textbook case of compound failure: unexpected rain direction, insufficient upstream sensors, and collapsed communications. Planning must incorporate black-sky scenarios where phone and internet go down. Investment in radio networks and decentralized warning systems would reduce such chaos.

    • UniversityStudent November 30, 2025

      Can universities help by sponsoring low-cost sensor kits and training citizens? We could set up community monitoring like in other countries.

    • Dr. Elena Morales November 30, 2025

      Yes, community-based monitoring is effective. Students and faculty can partner with local agencies to deploy sensors and run drills, but funding and political will are required.

    • Somchai November 30, 2025

      As someone from Hat Yai, I support academic partnerships, but don’t forget practical needs: boats, fuel, and shelters must be prioritized.

    • P’Nok November 30, 2025

      Shelters at universities are helpful, but many elderly won’t leave unless family helps — social networks matter in evacuations.

  5. Kitt November 30, 2025

    Volunteers did heroic work, but five functioning boats for thousands is insane. The municipality should maintain a standby fleet and support volunteer rescue groups with supplies. Relying on goodwill alone isn’t sustainable.

    • Volunteer123 November 30, 2025

      We were exhausted — volunteers chipped in but were under-equipped. The city should reimburse fuel and repair costs, and provide training.

    • Kitt November 30, 2025

      Exactly, and volunteers need official coordination when comms collapse; a simple radio channel could help direct boats to priority areas.

    • Larry Davis November 30, 2025

      This strikes me as a logistical failure more than corruption. Fix the boats and radios and move on.

  6. Larry Davis November 30, 2025

    I lived through a flood years ago; bureaucracies always move slowly, but finger-pointing won’t help victims now. Focus resources on relief first and then on blame later. Resignations might create chaos during recovery.

    • Mai November 30, 2025

      That sounds reasonable, but without consequences the same mistakes repeat. How do we ensure accountability without harming immediate rescue?

    • Larry Davis November 30, 2025

      Independent audits after recovery can balance accountability and stability; immediate resignations rarely improve on-the-ground rescue.

  7. Mai November 30, 2025

    I’m angry — flags and warnings are basic. My aunt saw the green flag and stayed put because she trusted it. An apology doesn’t warm her home or replace lost medicines. Somebody must be held responsible.

    • Somsak November 30, 2025

      Aunt Mai, your anger is valid. The city should prioritize those injured and make direct compensation available, then pursue investigations.

    • Mai November 30, 2025

      Compensation is fair, but it must be quick and transparent. Families cannot wait months for paperwork to be approved.

  8. UniversityStudent November 30, 2025

    We lost internet and phones during the worst hours; it’s scary how fragile our systems are. If universities back open-source mesh networks, communities could communicate even when telcos fail. It feels doable on a student budget.

    • Dr. Elena Morales November 30, 2025

      Mesh networks are promising, but require planning and maintenance. They also need buy-in from municipalities and emergency services to be useful during disasters.

    • UniversityStudent November 30, 2025

      I’ll bring it up with our student union — if we pilot one, maybe the city will replicate it elsewhere.

  9. Somchai November 30, 2025

    I think the mayor did what he could under terrible circumstances, staying on the ground and apologizing publicly. Not everyone leading can foresee unprecedented weather. Let’s support recovery teams now.

    • Anna November 30, 2025

      Supporting recovery doesn’t mean avoiding questions about why the forecast missed this event. Both support and scrutiny are necessary.

    • Somchai November 30, 2025

      Fair point, Anna. I’ll volunteer for community review meetings once recovery is underway so we can push for improvements without disrupting immediate aid.

    • grower134 November 30, 2025

      Volunteering to review is easy; getting real answers from agencies is the hard part. Don’t be naive about bureaucratic stonewalling.

  10. Nok November 30, 2025

    This feels like a national issue, not just Hat Yai’s problem. Climate volatility will hit other cities in unexpected ways and our whole disaster system must be rethought. Central funding for flexible emergency kits is overdue.

    • P’Nok November 30, 2025

      Central funding helps, but local knowledge matters too; funds should empower municipalities, not just impose one-size-fits-all solutions.

    • Nok November 30, 2025

      Agreed, P’Nok. Funding should be conditional on community-designed plans so it’s responsive and practical.

    • Somsak November 30, 2025

      Local plans plus central support represent the best path forward. We need both money and trained local responders.

Leave a Reply to Mai Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »