Deputy Prime Minister and Transport Minister Suriya Jungrungreangkit has emphatically decreed that all future electric train network plans outside Bangkok must safeguard the sanctity of historical sites within inner-city areas. This directive comes in the wake of the Mass Rapid Transit Authority of Thailand’s (MRTA) ambitious proposal to develop electric rail networks across major cities like Chiang Mai, Nakhon Ratchasima, Phuket, and Phitsanulok, with an estimated combined budget of 77 billion baht.
The primary objective of these projects, according to the MRTA, is to offer residents a modern public transport option aimed at alleviating chronic congestion in urban centers while enhancing access to tourism hotspots located on the outskirts. However, the proposed 30-billion-baht electric train route in Chiang Mai has stirred considerable debate, with many critics voicing concerns over the potential threat to historical sites in the Muang district.
Responding to these apprehensions, Minister Suriya has suggested a balanced approach: constructing a section of the route that traverses the Old City area underground while keeping the rest at street level. “This could reduce the disruptive impact on tourism sites and mitigate traffic issues in inner-city locations,” he explained.
To solidify this approach, Mr. Suriya has commissioned a thorough study, which he anticipates will be completed within the next year. Following the study’s conclusion, the MRTA aims to promptly initiate construction. However, before breaking ground, an environmental impact assessment (EIA) report must be submitted to the pertinent authorities.
The proposed 15.8-kilometer line is set to stretch from Nakornping Hospital in Mae Rim district to Mae Hia-Samakki Intersection, featuring 16 stations in total. To facilitate commuter convenience, two park-and-ride facilities are planned—one at Nakornping Hospital and the other at Chiang Mai’s Land Transportation Office.
Mr. Suriya also noted that the MRTA is currently preparing the investment proposal for this large-scale project, a task expected to take about a year. The proposal is slated for submission to the cabinet in 2026. Following this, the MRTA plans to conduct a bid to attract investors between 2027 and 2028.
Construction work is anticipated to commence by 2028, with the electric train line projected to be fully operational by 2031, according to Mr. Suriya. The future of transportation in these major cities looks promising, as these electric rail initiatives not only aim to ease traffic woes but also open new avenues for tourism and urban connectivity.
It’s essential to preserve Chiang Mai’s historical landmarks! Ruining our rich heritage for convenience is not the way forward.
But modern infrastructure can coexist with history. An underground section is a brilliant compromise.
I agree. We need progress, but not at the expense of our cultural legacy. Underground could work.
As long as they ensure proper preservation, I guess. But I remain skeptical until I see it done right.
How many times have we heard this before? Promises of preservation often lead to neglect once construction starts.
Increased tourism is a double-edged sword. Yes, we might get more visitors, but does Chiang Mai have the capacity to handle this influx?
True, we need to balance growth with sustainability or risk losing what makes our city special.
Exactly! It’s not just about numbers, it’s the quality and the impact on the local community.
Tourism can bring in much-needed revenue. It’s a risk, but isn’t it worth taking?
Chiang Mai needs planning, not just an influx of people. Proper zoning and infrastructure upgrades are essential.
I’m worried about the environmental impact. These projects rarely go without damaging the ecosystem.
The EIA report will be crucial. But will it actually influence decisions or just be a formality?
Good point. How often do we see EIAs that are completely ignored once money starts flowing in?
Does anyone know the exact historical sites that might be affected? We can’t protect what we don’t understand.
The park-and-ride facilities sound good in theory, but will they be affordable and convenient enough to use?
If they price it right, people will use it. If not, it’ll just be another white elephant project.
I hope they listen to local needs and not just impose a one-size-fits-all solution.
Affordability is key. But also, the locations need to be strategic to avoid additional traffic headaches.
2031 seems so far away. Will the current team still be around to ensure continuity and accountability?
What about the locals who will be displaced due to construction? Any mention of compensation?
That’s a major concern. Urban development often overlooks the little guy. Proper compensation and resettlement plans must be clear.
Absolutely. History has shown us that promises to the displaced are often broken.
Nakhon Ratchasima and other cities should also benefit. Why focus so much on Chiang Mai?
Practical question: What about power outages? How will the train system handle sudden electricity cuts?
Backup generators and contingency plans should be part of the infrastructure setup.
True, but those aren’t foolproof. Especially in areas prone to frequent outages.
Cost overruns are almost a given. Are we prepared for the budget to balloon way past 30 billion baht?
Transparency will be crucial. But who’s watching the watchdogs?
Exactly. We need rigorous auditing and public access to project spending details.
Investing in electric trains is good for the environment. I’m all for cleaner alternatives to reduce pollution.
Sure, but the construction will have a huge carbon footprint too. Short-term pain for long-term gain, I guess.
In theory, this sounds great. In practice, let’s hope it doesn’t turn into another unfulfilled promise.
Importing expertise might be necessary. Do we have qualified professionals to oversee such a massive project locally?
We have talent, but also collaborating with international experts can bring in fresh perspectives and best practices.
Absolutely, a mix of local knowledge and international experience might be the best recipe for success.
What guarantees do we have that this electric train system won’t inflate ticket prices and make it inaccessible for many?
Time to think long-term. If we don’t invest in modern public transport now, the future will be even more congested and unsustainable.
Long-term thinking is rare in these projects. Often it’s about political gains and quick wins.
Will this affect local businesses during construction? The disruption could be catastrophic for some.