Imagine picking up the phone, the gentle buzz of anticipation as the call connects you to a voice on the other end, a voice ready to ask you about something that’s been lingering in the air—quite literally. Across the nation, from bustling city streets to the tranquility of rural townships, 1,123 people were posed with a question that weighs heavily on their minds: “Are you concerned about PM2.5?” The verdict? A resounding nod towards concern with nearly 90% knitting their brows over this invisible adversary.
Spoken amidst the chatter of a Sunday, the results echoed the public’s trepidation. This wasn’t a matter of a mere handful; this was the voice of the populace, the drone of worry that buzzed louder than any beehive:
- A hefty 48.89% admitted they were ‘rather worried’,
- while the 41.58% took a step further into the realm of being ‘very worried’,
- leaving a slim 8.19% in the camp of ‘not too worried’,
- and a mere 1.34% unshaken with ‘not worried at all’.
Peering through the lens of optimism, 74.53% of these respondents stood firm in their belief that the government’s arms were open wide enough to embrace and tackle the PM2.5 issue head-on. Meanwhile, 25.47% held onto the hope that somehow, the authorities would find a way to triumph over the smog.
Beyond the veil of numbers, PM2.5 remains an insidious phantom—fine dust particles smaller than a whimsy, capable of escaping into the air we breathe, and tying knots in the thread of our very existence, especially for those with hearts and lungs dancing on the edge of vulnerability.
The burning question of ‘where does it originate?’ elicited a chorus of answers:
- A significant 79.04% blamed the burning of farm waste and forest fires,
- factory emissions had 70.65% casting a wary eye,
- and the buzz of construction sites put 68.42% on edge.
(Note the liberty of choice here, as many named more than one culprit.)
Circling back, the issue’s persistence puzzled many. According to the wisdom of the crowd:
- A dominant 82.87% pointed to the cyclical nature of forest fires and farm residue burning,
- while 69.22% deftly observed that both human intervention and Mother Nature’s whims play roles in this PM2.5 drama,
- and 66.28% couldn’t look past the constant drum of construction that never seems to miss a beat.
The Pollution Control Department, in a digital dispatch, lamented the state of affairs: high levels of PM2.5 are still a shadow over many parts of the country. With readings over 10 micrograms per cubic metre chipping away at health, it’s hard to ignore—even when the official ‘all clear’ siren sounds at 37.6μg/m3.
In the line of fire: territories from Bangkok to Nong Khai, dealing with this suffocating specter. Delegates, activists, and residents all share in their grit to clear the air—a united front against a common foe.
But, lo and behold, a glimmer of triumph as Sunday ushered in a new decree: the government’s handshake with sugarcane farmers. Smoke trails dissipate as more farmers lay down their matches, coaxed with a compensation pact that sweetens the deal: 120 baht for every tonne of non-burnt sugarcane harvest—a bulb of light in a fog of war against farm waste fires, a nod from Deputy Government Spokesperson Kenikar Unjit to the green shoots of progress.
This is more than a chit-chat over phone lines; this is a story weaved in concern and action, in numbers that bind us, and in voices that, together, can rise above the haze of PM2.5. We may just breathe easier yet.
Be First to Comment