When eight months pregnant Tarn took to national television on January 5 to unburden a deeply personal betrayal, she did more than tell a tragic love triangle story — she put a spotlight on how stress and secrecy can endanger both marriage and maternity. Appearing on Channel 3’s Hone Krasae programme with host Kanchai Kamnerdploy watching closely because of her fragile condition, Tarn described discovering what she calls an affair between her soldier husband and a female teacher known only as Bee.
The missing husband and the LINE messages
According to Tarn’s account, the saga began the way many modern mysteries do: with a missing phone call and unnerved silence. Her husband reportedly took leave from military duties but disappeared for a day, refusing to pick up her calls. Alarmed, Tarn asked his superior officer for help. When the soldier was finally located, Tarn says she questioned him — and then checked his phone.
In the digital trail she found evidence that would change everything: romantic messages between the soldier and the teacher, Bee, exchanged on LINE. Tarn told the programme she used her husband’s account to message Bee while pretending to be him. The conversation ended abruptly when Bee realised she was actually speaking with Tarn, not the soldier.
Admission, alleged continuation and threats of legal action
Tarn told viewers her husband admitted to the relationship when confronted. She believed the matter was closed when he agreed to stop contacting Bee, but later learned the two allegedly continued communicating — and, she claims, engaged in sexual relations for months after. When Tarn demanded a decision and warned of legal action against both parties, she says her husband remained silent.
Throughout the interview she used cautious language — “said,” “alleged,” and “claimed” — reflecting that these are accusations now being investigated. The accused teacher and soldier have not publicly replied, and the army has not yet issued an official statement. The school where Bee teaches has announced it will form an investigation committee to examine the claims.
Health consequences: when heartbreak becomes medical crisis
What makes Tarn’s story especially heart-rending is the toll the scandal purportedly took on her pregnancy. She reported developing a threatened abortion condition and required hospital admission. Medical staff, she said, advised terminating the pregnancy to preserve her life; Tarn refused, saying she would rather sacrifice herself than her unborn child. Doctors originally expected her to give birth in March, but they warned that ongoing stress may force a much earlier delivery, possibly as soon as mid-February.
Perhaps most painful, Tarn said, was her husband’s absence during this medical crisis. She claims he spent time with Bee rather than visiting her in hospital. If true, the silence and absence deepen the emotional stakes and complicate decisions about their family’s future.
Why Tarn wants the teacher removed
Beyond personal vindication, Tarn framed her demand for the teacher’s removal from the school as a matter of public trust. She argued to the programme that, if the relationship with a married man is true, such behaviour makes the teacher unfit to supervise or instruct children — a claim that has prompted the school to open an inquiry.
At the same time, Tarn acknowledged that pursuing the case could have ripple effects: her husband’s military career may face disciplinary action if the army’s investigation finds wrongdoing. Still, she insists she will continue to seek justice for herself and her unborn child.
What happens next?
At present, multiple institutions — the school and potentially the military — will need to sort fact from allegation. Investigations may include interviews, message-forensics, and testimonies from all involved. The court of public opinion has already weighed in, following Tarn’s televised account, but formal procedures will determine the official outcome.
This story touches on broader themes: the power of modern messaging platforms like LINE to expose infidelity, the emotional cost of betrayal, and how stress can have very real medical consequences for expectant mothers. Whether you come for the dramatic details or stay for the human element, Tarn’s testimony on Hone Krasae has put a private wound into public view — forcing institutions and individuals alike to reckon with the fallout.
Final thought
As the investigation unfolds, sympathy for Tarn’s health and her unborn child remains paramount. Allegations, by nature, require careful proof. But the case is already a stark reminder: when relationships fracture, the consequences can extend far beyond heartbreak — affecting livelihoods, reputations, and, in this instance, the very health of the next generation.
This is messy and public. Who benefits from airing this on TV when a baby is at risk? I think both adults deserve scrutiny, but the pregnant woman was put in a terrible position.
Public shaming never solves anything, but evidence on LINE is hard to ignore. If true, the soldier betrayed his duty to family and profession. Schools must protect students, but investigations should be fair.
Fair? She went on national TV while pregnant and accused a teacher. That’s hardly impartial. The court of public opinion can ruin lives before facts emerge.
I agree facts matter, but secrecy led to real harm here. You can’t ignore the medical consequences she described. The husband must be held accountable if proven true.
Accountability is fine, but firing a teacher on allegations alone sets a dangerous precedent. Get the evidence, then act.
This reads like a modern cautionary tale about messaging apps. People think private chats are private until they aren’t. The emotional and medical fallout makes this more than just gossip.
LINE logs can be faked, though. Message forensics will be crucial. Why are institutions so slow to comment when lives are at stake?
Exactly — we need trained forensic analysts, not armchair detectives. But waiting indefinitely also lets rumors fester and hurt Tarn further.
Isn’t it illegal to read someone else’s phone? Seems like she crossed a line even if she had reasons. Still, I feel bad for her and the baby.
From a medical standpoint, acute stress can precipitate obstetric complications. If she truly had a threatened abortion, emotional trauma likely contributed. This elevates the case from personal dispute to a public health concern.
So teachers are held to higher moral standards, but soldiers too? Both are public-facing roles. If true, both could face consequences in their professions, not just reputational damage.
Military codes of conduct differ, but extramarital relationships may trigger disciplinary review depending on local regulations. Again, we must differentiate allegation from proven misconduct.
Differentiation is fine in theory, but Tarn said she confronted them and was ignored. That silence itself is damning to many people. Emotions run high in these situations.
The teacher-teacher dynamic strikes me as disturbing if children were around. But removal should wait for the school’s probe. Knee-jerk firing over TV claims is risky.
As the host, I can say we aimed to highlight the human angle, not convict anyone. Media attention is a double-edged sword here. Our duty is to inform, not to judge prematurely.
Why drag my name into this? If I were the accused, I’d demand an apology until evidence is shown. But hiding behind ‘alleged’ while ruining reputations is also a tactic.
TeacherBee, you should give a statement to clear things up quickly. Silence lets narratives fill the void and can harm all involved, especially the unborn child.
From the army side, we take complaints seriously. Investigations are delicate and often confidential. But if a soldier neglected family during a medical crisis, that will not be looked upon kindly.
It’s weird how modern tech turns private issues into public trials. Everyone’s a judge now. I worry about the baby’s future with all this chaos around.
I had to speak out because my health and my baby’s life were at risk. I didn’t want to be famous, I wanted help. If institutions care, they will investigate properly.
Thanks for speaking up, Tarn. No one should suffer alone while a partner disappears. I hope the school and army act fast and show compassion for your health.
Appreciate the support. It’s terrifying to be judged for protecting yourself while pregnant. I’m asking for fairness and safety, not vengeance.
I feel for her, but some details smell of showmanship. Going on a national programme at eight months is dramatic. Maybe there’s truth, but maybe this is also manipulation.
If the husband chose the other person over his pregnant wife, that’s unforgivable to many. But people make mistakes; context matters. Military life strains families, too.
I spoke too soon — context doesn’t excuse abandonment when health is at stake. The soldier should have prioritized his wife in hospital unless there are mitigating facts.
Mitigating facts like mental health, deployment stress, or coercion could change the picture. Blanket condemnation is simple but sometimes unfair.
Legally, institutions must preserve due process. But civil remedies for emotional and medical harm might be pursued if evidence supports causation. This could evolve into a complex multi-jurisdictional case.
If LINE messages can be authenticated and show a sustained sexual relationship, civil suits for emotional distress could follow. Criminal charges would depend on local statutes and evidence.
Exactly; authentication requires metadata, device logs, and perhaps witness testimony. The burden of proof differs by venue, so the path forward is not straightforward.
Media ethics demand we report allegations with caution. But when a woman is hospitalized and claims stress-related complications, that’s newsworthy. Balancing sensitivity with transparency is hard.
Teachers are supposed to be role models, but accusing someone without proof is reckless. I want the truth as much as anyone, but don’t destroy a career with hearsay.
Grower, every action has consequences. If the teacher had an affair with a married man and harmed another woman, that behavior affects community trust. Probes exist to sort this out.
I’ll wait for the probe, but I’m skeptical of public spectacles. Fix privacy laws and maybe fewer relationships will be exposed in painful, messy ways.
I just hope the unborn child is safe. All these adult dramas shouldn’t overshadow that simple fact. The rest can be sorted legally later.
This is a gendered story too. Women often bear the emotional and physical costs of male infidelity. Society needs to address that imbalance more robustly.
Also, it’s hypocritical how we demand morality from teachers and soldiers but not from patrons of power. Accountability must be consistent across professions.
I’ve seen enough online verdicts to know reputation can be shredded before facts emerge. If charged wrongly, I will pursue legal redress and my job back. But if I’m guilty, I accept consequences.
As a parent, I’d be worried about kids being taught by someone in scandal. But private life and professional life can be separate. The school investigation should weigh both.
This feels like a symptom of modern performative morality. People broadcast pain for validation, then demand institutions act. It’s messy and sometimes manipulative.
Nate, performances exist, but so do real victims. Dismissing every public plea as attention-seeking silences people who need help. We should be careful with skepticism.
Fair point, Sara. I’m just warning against rush-to-judgment. We must support Tarn medically while also ensuring a fair investigation for others.
As a new mom, the stress alone can be terrifying. If Tarn truly suffered a threatened abortion because of betrayal, that’s horrific. Men need to be held responsible when their actions have health consequences.
YoungMom, it’s also crucial to consider the teacher’s side. Women can be vilified quickly. Let the inquiry do its work, but provide immediate support for Tarn now.
Why are adults making kids collateral damage? The teacher’s behavior, if true, affects students indirectly. Schools should have transparent policies and quick, careful responses.