Press "Enter" to skip to content

Ruangkrai Leekitwattana’s Bold Move: Petition That Could Dissolve Move Forward Party Shakes Up Thai Political Scene

Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

On a bustling Thursday, underneath the watchful eyes of reporters and the relentless pulse of news cameras at the Office of the Election Commission, stood Petitioner Ruangkrai Leekitwattana. His mission? To spark a conversation that might just shake the foundations of Thailand’s political landscape. With a stroke of his pen, Mr. Ruangkrai submitted a petition that could potentially lead to the dissolution of the Move Forward Party, igniting a storm of debate over the lese-majeste law and its implications for the country’s constitutional monarchy.

Ruangkrai, armed with the legal backing of Section 92 of the organic law on political parties—a piece of legislation that perhaps not many outside legal circles would quote over dinner—contends that actions perceived to undermine the constitutional monarchy warrant judicial intervention. This came hot on the heels of a court ruling that cast Move Forward’s intentions in a dubious light, suggesting that its push to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code, known in hushed tones as the lese-majeste law, was in essence an attempt to erode the very bedrock of Thai governance.

The petitioner’s plea did not end there. He extended his challenge to the Election Commission, urging them to weigh in on whether executives of Move Forward should find themselves barred from the political playground for engaging in what he described as “the same wrongdoing.” But why stop at one when you can aim for a duo? Mr. Ruangkrai, in a move that could only be seen as doubling down, revealed plans to bring the National Anti-Corruption Commission into the fray against the Pheu Thai Party, dabbling in a game of political chess that would make even seasoned players blink.

Enter Pheu Thai, with its luminaries—Paetongtarn Shinawatra and Prime Minister hopeful Srettha Thavisin—having dared to whisper amendments to Section 112 amidst their campaign fervor. Like players in a grand, unfolding drama, they find themselves potential co-stars in Ruangkrai’s narrative of legal and ethical entanglements.

Yet, in true theatrical fashion, Thursday’s petitioning saga didn’t belong to Ruangkrai alone. Lawyer Teerayut Suwankesorn stepped onto the stage with a similar script, echoing demands to the Election Commission in light of Wednesday’s court ruling. His storyline intertwined with Ruangkrai’s, seeking to cast a shadow on the political aspirations of Move Forward, its former leader Pita Limjaroenrat, and its cadre of MPs who dared to question the untouchable sanctity of Section 112.

Teerayut’s narrative bent toward a dramatic climax, proposing that the guardians of Thailand’s ethical standards, the National Anti-Corruption Commission, scrutinize the seemingly rebellious acts of those who challenge the status quo, threatening them with a decade-long exile from the political stage. In a landscape where protecting the royal institution is not just an expectation but a mandated duty, the stakes could not be higher.

As the curtain falls on this episode, the audience — the Thai people and the watching world — are left in suspense, pondering the future of a country gripped by a clash between tradition and change, silence and speech, authority and aspiration. The plot, thick with political intrigue, legal battles, and the quest for justice, continues to unfold, reminding us that in the theatre of politics, the drama never truly ends.


  1. ThaiPatriot101 February 1, 2024

    Ruangkrai is doing what’s necessary for our country! The monarchy is integral to Thai identity. These parties trying to change that need to be stopped before they divide us further.

    • BangkokBarry February 1, 2024

      That’s a narrow view. Thailand’s monarchy needs to adapt if the country is to move forward with the rest of the world. Stagnation isn’t patriotic, it’s harmful.

      • SiamSoul February 1, 2024

        Adaptation doesn’t mean undermining royal authority. It means finding balance. Ruangkrai’s actions might wake up some people to see the risks involved with too much change too quickly.

    • FreedomVoice February 1, 2024

      Isn’t silencing political parties the opposite of democracy though? We should be able to debate and question laws, that’s healthy for any society.

      • ThaiPatriot101 February 1, 2024

        It’s one thing to debate, another to undermine. Protecting the fabric of our nation is paramount, and sometimes tough decisions have to be made.

  2. NakhonNancy February 1, 2024

    This whole situation feels orchestrated to scare off any real change. The law is being used as a weapon against free speech and political progression. We’re witnessing a crackdown in the guise of patriotism.

    • LegalEagleTh February 1, 2024

      Exactly! It’s worrying to see laws being manipulated this way. The use of legal systems to suppress opposition is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes, not democracies.

  3. ChiangMaiChampion February 1, 2024

    Why can’t we focus on the real issues? Education, healthcare, economic growth? This political theater distracts from what really matters to the Thai people.

    • FarmersFriend February 1, 2024

      Because these ‘theatrics’ as you call them, decide who gets to make those decisions for education, healthcare, and the economy. It’s all connected.

      • ChiangMaiChampion February 1, 2024

        Fair point. It’s just frustrating to see potential progress stalled by constant political infighting and legal battles.

  4. Youth4Change February 1, 2024

    Ruangkrai’s petition could be the start of a darker era for Thailand’s freedom of expression. We should all be worried about the repercussions of this on civic liberties.

    • DemocracyDefender February 1, 2024

      Worrying indeed. It sets a dangerous precedent for future governments to use the legal system as a tool to suppress dissenting voices.

    • SilencedMajority February 1, 2024

      But can you honestly say that challenging the monarchy is the right move? Maybe there’s a reason these laws exist.

      • TruthSeeker February 1, 2024

        Laws exist to serve the people, not suppress them. If a law no longer serves the public interest, it’s the right of the people to challenge and change it.

  5. OldSchool February 1, 2024

    Whatever happened to respecting traditions and our elders? The younger generation seems too eager to throw away everything that made Thailand unique.

    • NewVision February 1, 2024

      Traditions evolve, and so should nations. Respecting elders doesn’t mean we can’t strive for improvement and question outdated norms.

      • OldSchool February 1, 2024

        Improvement is one thing. Undermining foundational principles is another. There’s a fine line, and it seems to me that line is being crossed.

    • GenZVoice February 1, 2024

      But clinging to the past can hold us back. The world is changing, and if Thailand doesn’t change with it, we risk being left behind. That doesn’t mean losing our identity; it means expanding it.

  6. Order Cannabis Online Order Cannabis Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from ThailandMore posts in Thailand »