Fitness coach Po — the face behind a popular training page — has publicly admitted to an incident at a Bangkok pool that has since rippled across social media. In a frank statement, Po said he lightly disciplined a child with a fingertip after seeing the boy step on his diving fins; he expressed regret, accepted responsibility, and has repeatedly offered apologies and compensation while the case moves through police channels.
The episode took place on November 30 at about 4:30pm near a swimming pool where Po had just finished a diving session. Two boys were playing close to his equipment. According to Po’s account, the younger child, wearing an orange shirt, stepped on Po’s diving fins and waved a foam noodle toy nearby — behavior Po found disrespectful and potentially damaging to his gear.
Po says he first tried to correct the younger boy verbally. When the child did not apologise, Po admits he used the tip of a fingertip to tap the boy “lightly” to teach him a lesson. He has repeatedly insisted the action was not meant to harm the child, but to instruct him gently.
After the interaction, Po reports only the older boy in a black shirt apologised. The younger boy, Po says, smiled and scratched his head. Both children left the area without outward signs of distress.
Wanting to clear the air, Po set out to find the children’s parents. When he located the boys again, he escorted them to the pool reception to ask about their guardians. At that point a male guardian arrived and, according to Po, said he intended to press charges. Po acknowledged his actions but also told reporters he was upset about his damaged equipment — an element that, while less central than the welfare of the child, factored into the confrontation.
By 7:30pm the same day, Po received a call from Thong Lo police station and provided an official statement. He told police he was willing to mediate with the parents and to make amends, but noted the parents were not ready to engage in mediation at that time. Po says he has consistently offered to apologise, provide compensation, and cover any medical expenses should they be necessary; his account has been recorded with the police.
On December 2 Po noticed the story gaining traction online and said some reports sensationalised details. To prepare a full explanation and to step back from the online storm, he temporarily deactivated his social media accounts. When no contact was forthcoming from the family for mediation, Po returned to the police station on December 6 and reiterated his offers of compensation, medical expense coverage, and an apology post on his Facebook page.
Reflecting publicly on the episode, Po acknowledged his behaviour was inappropriate, especially given his visibility as a popular coach. He stressed that using force to resolve conflict was the wrong path and advocated peaceful dialogue instead. “I did not intend to hurt the child,” he said, while also accepting responsibility and expressing a desire to set a positive example going forward, according to Khao Sod’s report.
This story highlights a knot of issues that often surface when private incidents become public: the lines between discipline and harm, the expectations placed on public figures, and the speed at which social media can amplify a moment into a national conversation. For Po, the immediate steps have been admission, apology, and an appeal to resolve matters through the police and directly with the family.
Whether the parties reach a negotiated resolution or the case proceeds through formal channels, the episode serves as a reminder that those in the public eye are held to a higher standard — and that even a brief lapse in judgment can have outsized consequences. For now, Po has signalled his willingness to make amends and to learn from the incident, while authorities and the family determine the next steps.
Image credit: iStock


















This apology feels half-hearted. He admits fault but keeps justifying it with damaged gear. Public figures should know better and act first, explain later.
I get being protective of your kit, but tapping a child is not an instruction method. There are better ways to teach respect without touching.
As the coach involved, I truly regret using any force. I thought a light fingertip would be a quick lesson, but I accept it was wrong. I have offered apologies and compensation and I will cooperate with the family and police.
Your willingness to accept responsibility matters, but actions speak louder. Have you changed how you handle kids since then? Public coaching requires concrete policy changes.
Policy talk is fine but what does that mean day to day? A post and compensation don’t erase trust issues with parents. He needs transparent steps.
Exactly, Tony. A mea culpa isn’t the end. Show a plan: workshops, clear no-contact rules, or supervised training sessions with kids.
Social media blew this up fast. Maybe some headlines exaggerated details, but touching children is a clear red line. Online outrage isn’t great but accountability is needed.
Exaggerated? People love drama. Still, I think the coach got the short end because nobody showed the viral clip. Without video, we’re guessing intent.
Guessing isn’t good when a child’s welfare is involved. Even if the clip is missing, we should prioritize the family’s voice and evidence.
Why do people get so mad online? He said sorry and offered money. Isn’t that enough? Kids sometimes misbehave.
As a child psychologist, I worry about normalizing physical correction. Even seemingly minor contact can have a disproportionate impact on some children. Public figures must model nonviolent de-escalation.
What does de-escalation mean? Like tell them to stop? That sounds boring. Sometimes you gotta be firm.
It means clear, calm instructions, removing the child from danger, and involving guardians. Firmness can be achieved through boundaries, not touch.
Agree with Elena. Also note that apology must be child-focused, not brand-focused. The child and family need reassurance, not a PR statement.
I don’t care what his followers think — adults should not touch other people’s kids. Period. This should be a legal matter, not a PR cleanup.
Legal or not, the context matters. Did the kid step on expensive fins or aggressively play around the gear? We need facts before arrests.
Context can’t justify physical discipline. Respect property, sure, but you ask for parents, you call staff, you don’t touch a minor.
From a legal angle, intent and force level will be crucial. Police statements suggest mediation is possible, which often avoids harsher penalties. He made the right move by documenting and offering compensation.
I used to handle similar cases. A fingertip tap likely won’t lead to heavy charges unless there’s injury. But public pressure can change filing decisions. Documentation helps both sides.
Thanks, OfficerT. Exactly — transparent cooperation and offers of medical coverage reduce escalation. Still, trust is damaged and might require more than paperwork.
My kid could have been the child in orange and I’d be furious. I appreciate his apology but I want assurances no one will ever touch my child. Social status shouldn’t give leniency.
Parents’ concerns are valid. The coach should proactively invite the family to mediation sessions with a neutral facilitator. That could rebuild trust if the family is open.
A mediator sounds sensible. I just don’t want an apology that feels like damage control for his followers.
This is peak influencer culture: do something questionable, delete socials, post an apology, then return like nothing happened. The cycle protects clout, not victims.
Agreed, but we also need to avoid trial by tweet. People deserve due process. Blame the cycle, not only the person.
Due process is fine, but influencers get the softest landing. Real consequences would deter similar behavior.
If consequences hit, his followers will learn. If not, expect repeat drama. Simple feedback loop.
I find the media’s role interesting here. They amplify moral panics but also spotlight issues. The question is whether coverage helps kids or just feeds outrage.
Media feeds outrage for clicks, truth be damned. But sometimes that pressure forces real accountability, so it’s messy.
Messy is right. I’d like outlets to focus on solutions like training and protocols rather than endless hot takes.
Back in my day we disciplined kids differently and got results. Today’s cancel culture forgets nuance and experience.
As a veteran coach, I sympathize with protecting hard-earned gear. Kids need boundaries. A light tap used to be acceptable as a last resort.
That’s outdated. Schools moved away from corporal cues for reasons backed by research. Coaches should be trained in positive reinforcement.
Training is fine, but if a child puts expensive, safety-critical gear at risk, immediate correction prevents accidents. There’s a balance.
He should say sorry and never touch kids again. That’s all. My teacher says touching is wrong.
Alex has a good point for a child. As a parent, I want a clear no-touch rule from coaches. Trust matters most.
Thanks Mom. If he pays for therapy for the kid that’s okay. But no more tapping.