Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut’s life took a dramatic turn when he found himself at the helm of the freshly minted People’s Party (PP). This new political entity came into existence on August 9, just two days after the Constitutional Court dissolved the Move Forward Party (MFP) and sanctioned 11 of its executives with a decade-long political ban over their contentious stance on the monarchy, which the court claimed compromised national security.
At only 37, Natthaphong’s rise to PP leader was both unexpected and swift. Initially, it seemed likely that Sirikanya Tansakul, deputy leader of the MFP unaffected by the court’s ruling, would lead the new party. However, the mantle ultimately fell to Natthaphong. In a candid chat with the Bangkok Post, he acknowledged his primary challenge: securing a majority in the House of Representatives in the next election, which would allow the PP to govern independently and carry forward the MFP’s mission.
From Newcomer to Notable
Natthaphong’s rapid ascent in Thailand’s political arena is unprecedented but not unwarranted. He credits the dissolution of the Future Forward Party (FFP) and MFP by the Constitutional Court for propelling his career. Just three years ago, in 2019, he began his political journey with the FFP before the court disbanded it for violating election laws concerning donations.
Despite his meteoric rise, Natthaphong, a computer engineering graduate from Chulalongkorn University, asserts his legitimacy as the leader. He confidently vouched for his commitment to continuing the legacy of the party’s predecessor. Ready to face the electoral challenges ahead, he expressed his willingness to be the party’s candidate for Prime Minister if chosen. “The task now is to broaden our support and elevate our party’s standing. Even though we triumphed in last year’s poll, we need to exceed our achievements in the next election,” he stated.
Engaging with Every Corner
Under Natthaphong’s stewardship, the PP aims to pivot its focus towards local politics. He emphasized that engaging with rural voters is as crucial as connecting with the young, urban electorate that the FFP and MFP had previously engaged. “Local elections are as pivotal as national ones. Having party representatives in local bodies is vital for strengthening our presence, especially in the run-up to national polls in the next three years,” he explained.
Natthaphong highlighted a pressing issue illustrated by the MFP’s previous electoral performance: despite winning significant party-list votes in several provinces, they lagged in constituency votes due to Thailand’s deep-rooted patronage system. He firmly believes that the key to breaking this cycle lies in winning local elections and actively engaging with the populace. “By securing local victories and interacting with communities, we can demonstrate that improved life quality is achievable through sound policies alone, without political patronage,” he asserted.
The forthcoming provincial administration organization (PAO) election in Ratchaburi serves as a litmus test for this strategy. The election, contested by a PP candidate and a competitor from an “old power” group, will be telling.
Revamping Section 112
Natthaphong was also forthright about the party’s stance on Section 112 of the Criminal Code—Thailand’s contentious lese-majeste law. He reaffirmed the party’s commitment to revising the law, though he noted that the method and specifics still require robust discussion. Despite potential legal threats stemming from their position, he stressed that the party’s focus remains on the broader picture.
Even after losing key figures like Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, and Pita Limjaroenrat, Natthaphong expressed confidence in the party’s remaining talent. “Many capable young individuals are ready to assume roles within the party. Being elected as MPs is just a means to an end—a tool for driving and implementing policies. Post-MP roles, members can continue contributing significantly,” he remarked.
Looking Ahead with Bold Plans
Natthaphong emphasized that the party will vigorously pursue constitutional amendments and scrutinize the powers of public independent organizations, particularly the Constitutional Court’s capacity to dissolve parties and examine politicians’ ethics. As the opposition leader, he stressed that the PP would intensify its oversight of the Pheu Thai-led government while advocating for the government’s support on bills proposed by the party.
Despite recent political shifts, with Srettha Thavisin replaced as Prime Minister by Pheu Thai leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Natthaphong opined that Thailand’s political landscape might not see significant changes. His determined and dynamic leadership may well set a new course for the People’s Party in these unpredictable times.
Natthaphong’s rise is incredible! He’s so young yet already taking on such a big responsibility. I think he’ll bring fresh ideas to Thai politics.
It’s impressive, sure, but does he have the experience needed? Leading a nation requires more than just youthful enthusiasm.
Enthusiasm can drive change. It’s time for someone younger with new perspectives to shake things up!
Exactly, Jay! Experience matters but so does vision and the will to improve things.
Taking on Section 112 is political suicide! He’s going to face huge resistance from traditionalists.
That’s the point. You can’t keep avoiding issues just because they’re controversial. If not now, when?
I agree with TommyD. Addressing tough topics is essential for progress. Section 112 needs a rethink.
I get it, but realistically, can he survive long enough politically to implement these changes?
Does Natthaphong’s engineering background help in politics? It seems like a non-traditional path.
Diverse backgrounds in politics are beneficial. It can bring logical and systemic thinking to governmental issues.
Absolutely! Engineers are problem solvers. Natthaphong could streamline and innovate in government processes.
Fair points. New perspectives are definitely needed in politics.
Focusing on local politics is smart. Local issues often get overlooked. Winning at the community level could solidify their national presence.
I agree, Samantha. Local engagement builds trust and loyalty which can translate to national support.
Sure, but local elections don’t always translate to national success. Different voter bases.
True, Zack. But it’s a start. You can’t ignore grassroots movements.
How can they realistically break the patronage system? It’s so ingrained in Thai politics.
Natthaphong’s confidence is admirable, but without the heavyweights like Thanathorn and Pita, can PP really stand a chance?
Revamping Constitutional powers is a bold move, but will it change anything? The establishment is too powerful.
Every reform starts with one step. If we don’t start somewhere, nothing will ever change.
Isn’t Natthaphong just a puppet for the old MFP executives? Seems like they placed him there to continue their agenda.
PP winning the PAO election would be a huge statement. It could demonstrate their growing influence and validate Natthaphong’s strategies.
Targetting young voters while engaging with rural demographics is key. If Natthaphong can balance both, PP might just pull it off.
Young voters are a force, but they’re also fickle. PP will need consistent policies to keep them engaged.
Agreed! Policies need to be inclusive of both demographics for sustained success.
People underestimate Natthaphong because of his age. Many great leaders started young. Let’s see what he can do.
Pheu Thai’s still strong; PP will have a tough time. Paetongtarn Shinawatra’s leadership isn’t to be underestimated.
Going against the Constitutional Court could backfire. They have significant power and aren’t afraid to use it.
Will we see real change, or is this just another cycle of political promises and no action?
Cynicism is understandable but give Natthaphong and PP a chance. New leadership can surprise us.