In the vibrant heart of Phuket, a tale of deception unfolded that seemed straight out of a crime novel. Beneath the sunny skies and sandy beaches, a covert operation was underway, threatening the serenity of this island paradise. The scene opens on a bustling warehouse in the Muang district, where endless streams of parcels flowed like secrets in the moonlight. This unexpected warehouse hub, however, wasn’t what it seemed.
The protagonist—or perhaps the antagonist?—of our story is a 30-year-old woman, now finding herself at the center of a police investigation. The clever enterprise she orchestrated was as ripe and baffling as a plot twist. Allegedly, she dispatched unsolicited, subpar goods to unsuspecting recipients who hadn’t ordered them, raking in an impressive 80,000 baht a day. Yes, you read that right—a day!
Phuket’s chief of police, the vigilant Pol Maj Gen Sinlert Sukhum, elaborated on the unfolding drama. For weeks, his team had their eyes fixed on the mysterious warehouse. It was a curiosity, an enigma wrapped in brown paper and string, as massive numbers of parcels dispatched from there raised eyebrows and sparked interest. The stage was set, and it was time for the police to make their move.
Upon entering the warehouse, they uncovered a kaleidoscope of chaos—substandard and unregistered goods of every kind imaginable. Cosmetics nestled next to IT gadgets, consumer items intermingled with whimsical stickers. This was no ordinary stockroom; it was a smorgasbord of the unsolicited and unexpected.
Enter the database wizardry—our suspect held a treasure trove of online buyers’ names and addresses. Her modus operandi was as old as commerce itself: trickery. She delivered these lackluster products to people who had never dreamed of ordering them. Upon arrival, many assumed a mistake and paid up, believing either they or a family member had placed the order. Each mistaken soul handed over 259 baht per parcel, a little fee for what seemed like the convenience of home delivery.
But here’s where her scheme reached new heights: the rejected parcels were not defeated—no, they were resurrected! Like a villain with a comeback, they were repackaged and dispatched anew, hunting for gullible hearts and open pockets. Investigators revealed that this operation had been thriving since August of the previous year—ingenious or insidious, you decide.
As that Sunday night sun dipped below the horizon, casting long shadows of intrigue, the police combed through the amassed hoard. They discovered around 20,000 products and 5,000 parcels primed for distribution. That very day, 2,000 parcels had already begun their stealthy journey.
As it stands, the suspect faces charges for possessing goods of questionable quality destined for the marketplace. Yet, the story doesn’t end here. Public fraud charges loom on the horizon, as the saga continues to unfold. Chief Sinlert urged the unsuspecting victims to step forward, assuring them of the protection of justice and the chance to reclaim their peace and perhaps a bit of their baht.
So, while the waves gently kiss the shores of Phuket, a ripple of truth spreads through the community, reminding us all that even amidst paradise, vigilance is the best keepsake.


















It’s shocking how such an operation can run unchecked for so long under everyone’s noses in a popular tourist spot like Phuket.
True, but scams like these thrive on people’s ignorance and the assumption that things are legitimate.
I suppose we need better education about online scams. People often trust things way too easily.
This isn’t just about education; banks and delivery services also need to do more to protect consumers.
Honestly, people should double-check packages they didn’t order. Who doesn’t do this?
You’d be surprised! Some folks are just too busy or assume it’s a gift from family or friends.
Yep, but some just enjoy the thrill of it and don’t think about the consequences.
Sounds like an entrepreneurial spirit gone wrong. Quite clever, but terribly unethical.
Clever? It’s scams like these that give genuine businesses a bad name.
I agree, but it’s intriguing how she managed to manipulate the buyer’s psychology so well.
I think the penalty should be severe to deter such schemes. Justice must be served!
But what punishment fits a crime like this? Is jail time truly effective?
Perhaps not, but fines and community service could be a start. Hit them where it hurts—their wallet.
This is exactly why laws on online transactions need to be tighter.
I wonder how she got hold of all those people’s addresses and information?
Everyone jumps on small companies without knowing the full story. Maybe she was forced into it.
Being conned like this must be frustrating. People like her exploit trust which is so damaging.
Technology is a double-edged sword, creating such opportunities for both legitimate and illegitimate businesses.
Isn’t it worrying how easy it is to set up such a scam without red flags being raised immediately?
I hope this raises awareness among consumers to be more cautious and skeptical.
It sounds like a failure of many systems—legal, postal, and even consumer minds.
This kind of manipulation is infuriating yet interesting to see how it played out for so long.
The article fails to mention if there were any accomplices. Could she have done this alone?
I think she should be named so others can recognize and avoid such scammers in the future.
What about compensation for those who lost money in this scam? Shouldn’t they prioritize refunds?