In recent times, the energetic and spirited youth of Thailand have been rallying near the Government House, voicing their objections against the government’s proposal to legalize casino operations. Captured in a photo by Chanat Katanyu, their gathering signifies a dynamic chapter in Thailand’s socio-political landscape.
However, for the Finance Ministry, led by the Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat, the casino-entertainment complex project forms a core part of the Pheu Thai-led governmental agenda, though Julapun emphasizes patience as flood recovery efforts in the North take precedence. Before pushing the project further, the Ministry has resolved to hold in-depth discussions with coalition partners to ensure cohesive agreement and unity of purpose.
Reflecting on the public opinion court as mandated by Section 77 of the constitution, Mr. Julapun reveals that the bill to legalize casinos has received noteworthy positive feedback. A journey to the Cabinet’s discussions is anticipated later this year, yet the bill’s realization is not expected in the short term. “It’s a marathon, not a sprint,” Julapun hints, noting that no set expectations or deadlines are hovering overhead for the Pheu Thai Party regarding this venture.
For this ambitious plan to succeed, detailed discussions must engage all stakeholders. Mr. Julapun acknowledges that the legislative process may refine the bill, influenced by the diverse backgrounds of the committee members involved in examining the proposal. Specific provinces remain unnamed as potential sites for the complexes, with a decisive committee positioned to select locations aligning with the broader tourism promotion strategy.
An independent feasibility study will be commissioned to analyze the multifaceted impacts of such complexes, from job creation to societal reverberations within local communities. As the Finance Ministry prepares its legislative bill, a policy board chaired by none other than the prime minister will be established to guide and govern gaming operations.
The operational licence for each complex extends a substantial 30 years, renewable for another decade, indicating a significant long-term commitment. Alongside the initial 5 billion baht registration fee, operators are to contribute an annual levy of 1 billion baht, with assessments scheduled every five years. Speculative projections point towards five potential venues: securing two sites in Bangkok while strategic placements in the Eastern Economic Corridor, Chiang Mai, and Phuket are considered.
With six formidable business entities vying for a stake in the project, Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul insists on earlier, deeper dialogues among coalition partners before Cabinet submission. In a candid expression of doubt, Chaichanok Chidchob, Bhumjaithai’s secretary-general, conveyed his skepticism about the bill’s efficacy in addressing illegal gambling and its unclear blueprint on ensuring employment for Thai workers.
Meanwhile, anticipation builds as Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra readies to hold impactful discussions at the Government House with esteemed business leaders, aiming to catalyze economic growth. Jirayu Houngsab, an advisor to the prime minister, affirms that this meeting will involve influential figures like Sanan Angubolkul of the Thai Chamber of Commerce and other industrial giants.
The agenda, as prepared by the JSCCIB, includes practical proposals to invigorate the economy, support small and medium enterprises, and enhance water resource management. Critically, Narit Therdsteerasukdi, spearheading the Board of Investment, underscores the prime minister’s commitment to driving Thailand towards its Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program, leveraging the National Electric Vehicle Policy Committee’s vision for a greener industrial future.
Legalizing casinos in Thailand is a terrible idea. It will create more gambling addiction problems and ruin local communities.
I totally disagree. Legal casinos can create jobs and boost the economy. Plus, it could reduce illegal gambling.
Jobs aren’t everything if it means destroying families and creating more addicts.
And what about the social costs? It’s not just about money, it’s about well-being too!
I can see both points, but shouldn’t we prioritize proper regulation if it does happen?
The youth have every right to protest. It’s their future that’s at stake here.
Protesting is fine, but they should also have solutions. Saying ‘no’ isn’t enough.
They are demanding more sustainable economic alternatives, like tech and clean energy jobs.
Sometimes youth activism is more passionate than practical. We need to listen but also be realistic.
An independent study is crucial here. We need to know all the impacts before deciding anything.
Exactly. Decisions like these can have long-term consequences, both good and bad.
If the bill really improves tourism and creates jobs, why not give it a chance?
Are casinos the best way to promote tourism? What about using Thailand’s natural beauty instead?
Natural beauty can be a focus, but casinos can offer something that attracts a different kind of tourist.
The long-term licenses bother me. A 30-year commitment without certainty on its impact is risky.
Long-term planning is essential for major investments. But you’re right, the impact is uncertain.
Exactly, there should be more frequent reviews, not just every five years.
Flood recovery should take priority. Casinos can wait until the country’s more stable.
True, but can’t we plan for the future while handling immediate issues?
If they ensure Thai workers benefit directly from this, perhaps it’s worth exploring.
But will they really? Or will it just benefit big businesses?
Focusing solely on casinos misses the bigger picture. Let’s talk about overall sustainable growth instead.
Illegal gambling is an issue, but should we just replace it with legal casinos?
The environmental impact of new complexes could be huge. What about sustainability?
That is a good point. Balancing economic benefits with environmental responsibility is key.
Casinos just add to the list of distractions. Should be spending resources on education and innovation.